What does "definition is independent of the choice of" mean?
An example:
Let $W$ be Banach and $V$ a normed space. Let $X$ be a dense subspace of $V$. Let $T \in Lin(X,W)$. For every $v \in V$ there exists $(x_k) \in X$ s.t. $\lim_{k \rightarrow \infty} x_k = v$.
Prove that the definition of $\lim_{k \rightarrow \infty} T(x_k)$ is independent of the choice of the sequence $(x_k)$.
It means that if you take another object satisfying assumptions then what comes out is the same result. Therefore we can define something without specifying the underlying object (any is good) which might be technically necassary for the definition.
In your example: if you take another sequence $(y_k)\subseteq X$ such that $\lim y_k=v$ then $$\lim T(y_k)=\lim T(x_k)$$
(The equality is what you have to prove)
Therefore you can define $T(v):=\lim T(x_k)$. This definition is correct because of the independence (the continuity and/or linearity of $T$ is a different problem). I don't have to specify how exactly I constructed the sequence $(x_k)$. Any is good.