I'm having a hugely hard time wrapping my head around this statement. I am trying to figure it out on my own but I just don't get it. The terminology is weird to me and I can't really picture what it "looks like" in my head.
Could someone refer me to some literature that may clear this up?
Could someone give a "diagonalization-for-dummies" answer?
It means you find a set of independent vectors $(e_1, e_2, \cdots , e_n)$ such that $$ f(e_1) = \lambda_1 e_1,$$ $$ f(e_2) = \lambda_2 e_2,$$ $$ \cdots $$ $$ f(e_n) = \lambda_n e_n$$ Thus in this basis the matrix of the transformation is like this: $$ \begin{bmatrix} \lambda_1 & 0 & 0 & \cdots & 0\\ 0 & \lambda_2 & 0 & \cdots & 0 \\ \vdots & & \ddots & & \vdots \\ \vdots & & & \ddots & \vdots \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & \cdots & \lambda_n\\ \end{bmatrix} $$