I am trying to understand a proof of the equivalence of all norms. Many of the proofs start by showing that two arbitrary norms $|| x ||_p$ and $|| x ||_q$ are equivalent to $||x||_1$ and thus the equivalence relation
$$ \alpha || x ||_p \le || x ||_q \le \beta || x ||_p $$
is transitive. Finally with the transitivity of $|| x ||_p$ and $|| x ||_q$ through $||x||_1$ is established, one only needs to show that $||x||_1$ is equivalent to some other arbitrary norm, say $||x||_k$.
This is done by first constructing the inequality
$$ \alpha \le ||v||_k \le \beta, \forall v \text{ with} ||v||_1 = 1 $$
and finding some bounds $\alpha, \beta$ on $||v||_k$.
This process is described succinctly here
Though I don't exactly understand what it means when it says "Finally we show that $f(x)\dots$ is continuous with respect to the $||.||_1$ norm".
I think I understand the concept geometrically. For instance, the $||x||_1$ norm is the unit circle/ball, and if we "draw" another norm enclosing this (by selecting $\alpha, \beta$ so that it does enclose), we are basically creating the first inequality stated.
Could someone explain the final step of this proof visually/geometrically with some light rigorous math information to back it up?


Just write down the definition of continuity of $f$: for any vector $x$ and $\epsilon > 0$, there exists $\delta > 0$ such that $|\|y\|_\beta - \|x\|_\beta| < \epsilon$ for any $y$ satisfying $\|y - x\|_1 \le \delta$.
Geometrically, continuity of $f$ at $x=0$ implies that for any $\epsilon > 0$, we can fit a small $\|\cdot\|_1$-ball inside a $\|\cdot\|_\beta$-ball of radius $\epsilon$.