I'm trying to decipher a set of relations from a John McCarthy paper:
$$ specializes(c1,c2) \land \neg ab1(p,c1,c2) \land ist(c1,p) \supset ist(c2,p) $$
and
$$ specializes(c1,c2) \land \neg ab2(p,c1,c2) \land ist(c2,p) \supset ist(c1,p) $$
The text is fairly clear about what the functions $specializes(\cdot)$ and $ist(\cdot)$ mean, but I have know idea what is meant by $ab1(\cdot)$ and $ab2(\cdot)$. Any ideas?
I found the answer in another paper by Akman and Surav:
Abnormality predicates seem to come from an earlier paper by McCarthy:
I think McCarthy often assumes you've read all his earlier papers, and therefore you can understand his notation...