e.g. Find the limit, $\lim\limits_{x \to 2} \ {\frac{2(x^2-4)}{x-2}}$, and prove it exists using the $\varepsilon$-$\delta$ definition of limits.
This might be a stupid question, but I'm having a hard time wrapping my head around the $\varepsilon$-$\delta$ definition.
To my understanding, the limit exists if I'm able to find it, and the $\varepsilon$-$\delta$ proof requires that I already know the limit. So, what exactly does the $\varepsilon$-$\delta$ definition prove? Seems to me like it's about confirming the already-found-limit by showing the continuity of the limit's immediate surrounding. It seems unnecessary.
The $\varepsilon$-$\delta$ concept and related are essential for a rigorous definition of limits and also to prove the base cases (eg $1/x$, $x^n$, etc.) and all the theorems that we use for the calculation of limits in the more general cases. All foundamental theorems indeed requires $\varepsilon$-$\delta$ concept to be proved. Thus, even if we don't recognize it, we always are referring to this basic concept when we calculate a limit.
Note also that the limit concept is essential to define continuity in a rigorous manner thus, from a logical point of view, one comes before the other.
With reference to the example, this is a problem wich can be easily solved by continuity eliminating the common factor $(x-2)$ but consider that the aim of the exercise here is theoretical in order to become familiar with $\varepsilon$-$\delta$ definition.