Can you explain for me what is convection-dominated problems? Definition and examples if possible.
Why don't we can apply standard discretization methods (finite difference, finite element, finite volume methods) for convection-dominated equation?
What is the importance of global Péclet number in this problem?
2026-03-28 13:35:37.1774704937
What is convection-dominated pde problems?
5.5k Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in PARTIAL-DIFFERENTIAL-EQUATIONS
- PDE Separation of Variables Generality
- Partial Derivative vs Total Derivative: Function depending Implicitly and Explicitly on Variable
- Transition from theory of PDEs to applied analysis and industrial problems and models with PDEs
- Harmonic Functions are Analytic Evan’s Proof
- If $A$ generates the $C_0$-semigroup $\{T_t;t\ge0\}$, then $Au=f \Rightarrow u=-\int_0^\infty T_t f dt$?
- Regular surfaces with boundary and $C^1$ domains
- How might we express a second order PDE as a system of first order PDE's?
- Inhomogeneous biharmonic equation on $\mathbb{R}^d$
- PDE: Determine the region above the $x$-axis for which there is a classical solution.
- Division in differential equations when the dividing function is equal to $0$
Related Questions in NUMERICAL-METHODS
- The Runge-Kutta method for a system of equations
- How to solve the exponential equation $e^{a+bx}+e^{c+dx}=1$?
- Is the calculated solution, if it exists, unique?
- Modified conjugate gradient method to minimise quadratic functional restricted to positive solutions
- Minimum of the 2-norm
- Is method of exhaustion the same as numerical integration?
- Prove that Newton's Method is invariant under invertible linear transformations
- Initial Value Problem into Euler and Runge-Kutta scheme
- What are the possible ways to write an equation in $x=\phi(x)$ form for Iteration method?
- Numerical solution for a two dimensional third order nonlinear differential equation
Related Questions in FINITE-DIFFERENCES
- 4-point-like central finite difference for second partial derivatives
- Numerical method for fourth order PDE.
- Finite difference approximation of $u''(x)+u(x)=0, u(0)=1, u(\pi)=-1$
- Numerically compute Laplacian of a scalar field in a non-orthogonal grid
- write second order difference as a convolution operator
- Do the second differences of the fifth powers count the sphere packing of a polyhedron?
- Discretization for $\partial_tu = \partial_x[g\times\partial_xu]$
- Discretization of 4th order ODE
- Trying to use Matlab to find Numerical Solution to $u''(x)+e^{u(x)}=0, u(0)=0, u(1)=0$ - Newton's method
- Finite difference: problem on edge of Dirichlet and Neumann boundary
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Suppose we are modeling a quantity $u$, say the concentration of a chemical, driven by a flow in some fluid in a region $\Omega$ with no source (meaning we are not adding more chemical into the fluid after starting the timer). Then the convection-diffusion pde to describe the phenomenon is: $$ \frac{\partial u}{\partial t} = \nabla \cdot (D \nabla u - \vec{b}u ).\tag{1} $$ This comes from linear hyperbolic conservation law (in the differential form): $$ \frac{\partial u}{\partial t} = -\nabla \cdot \vec{F}, $$ where $\vec{F}$ is the flux vector, and $$ \int_{\partial \Omega}\vec{F}\cdot n\,dS $$ measure the amount of chemical flows out from the domain of interest $\Omega$, and $\vec{F} = -D \nabla u + \vec{b}u$. $D$ is the diffusion constant, it describes how the quantity diffuses, $\vec{b}$ is a flow field, it may carry $u$ around. If we assume $D$ is a constant and $\vec{b}$ is a divergence free flow (incompressible), then (1) is: $$ \frac{\partial u}{\partial t} = \underbrace{D\Delta u}_{\text{Diffusion term}} - \underbrace{\vec{b}\cdot \nabla u}_{\text{Convection term}}. \tag{2} $$ Convection-dominance just means, in the convection-diffusion equation (2): $$D\ll \|\vec{b}\|.$$ The diffusion term is very small relative to the convection term.
Intuitively, diffusion means "smooth", while convection could possibly contain non-smoothness due to its derivation from an integral conservation law. For example, if we make the diffusion term $D\sim 0$ almost gone, the solution may looks like the following in a 2D problem:
where the solution's discontinuity "flows" with the field $\vec{b}$ on the right. If the diffusion constant is huge, i.e., not convection-dominated, then the steep slope will be smoothened as the quantity being transported along with the flow $\vec{b}$.
As I said in the comments, traditional numerical methods relies on the smoothness of the solution. Solution like above can't be solved by tradition numerical schemes like you listed. That's why people using Discontinuous Galerkin finite element to numerically solve this type of problems, while we don't impose the continuity conditions of the numerical solutions, in the meantime the conservation can be guaranteed numerically.
For the last question, please just read 2.1.4 here on page 33.