I'm reading Differential Forms in Algebraic Topology by Bott and Tu and I'm a little confused about the notation $H^{*-n}(M)$. I don't see a definition of this listed anywhere in the text, though I can sort of infer from context what's meant by the notation.
- I know that $H^k(M)$ is the $k$th cohomology class on $M$ (equivalence class of $k$-forms).
- I know too that $H^*(M)$ is the direct sum of all cohomology classes (i.e. $\bigoplus_{i=0}^\infty H^i(M)$ ).
- The first place in the text I can recall seeing this notation (or similar notation) is when they talk about the Poincar${\acute {e}}$ Lemma where they state an isomorphism $H_c^{*+1}(\mathbb{R}^n \times \mathbb{R}^1) \simeq H_c^*(\mathbb{R}^n)$. My guess here is that it has to do with how the dimensions of the forms get mapped to cohomology classes of different spaces (i.e. in this example stated, since $\mathbb{R}^n \times \mathbb{R}^1$ is essentially the same as $\mathbb{R}^{n+1}$, the isomorphism is somehow stating that $H_c^k(\mathbb{R}^n \times \mathbb{R}^1) \simeq H_c^{k-1}(\mathbb{R}^n)$?
- This notation is also used too in the context of vector bundles. If $\pi:E\to M$ is a rank-$n$ vector bundle on a manifold $M$ of dimension $k$, then Bott and Tu have stated that $H_{cv}^*(E) \simeq H^{*-n}(M)$ where the $cv$-distinction is for forms of compact vertical support. Is this to indicate that a compact-vertically supported $l$-form gets naturally sent to an $l-n$ form on $M$ via the projection $\pi_*$?
I may have just answered my own question, but I'm self-studying and it would be nice to have verification.
This community wiki solution is intended to clear the question from the unanswered queue.
In fact is is not unusual to write $H^*(M) = \bigoplus_{i=0}^\infty H^i(M)$. Then $$H^{*-n}(M) = \bigoplus_{i=0}^\infty G_i$$ where $G_i = 0$ for $i = 0,\ldots,n-1$ and $G_i = H^{i-n}(M)$ for $i \ge n$. Roughly speaking, this gives a new grading to $H^*(M)$.
As user113102 comments, it is simpler to regard $*$ as a variable. You could also write $i, m$ or something else instead of $*$.