If we need to attract students' attention to Control theory and explain that dynamic systems are everywhere, what is more useful nowadays, CT or DT? If you teach both, what is your personal experience in the student's appreciation of examples?
2026-04-07 01:50:47.1775526647
What is more useful in control theory:continuous time vs discrete time?
437 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in CONTROL-THEORY
- MIT rule VS Lyapunov design - Adaptive Control
- Question on designing a state observer for discrete time system
- Do I really need quadratic programming to do a Model Predictive Controller?
- Understanding Definition of Switching Sequence
- understanding set of controllable state for switched system
- understanding solution of state equation
- Derive Anti Resonance Frequency from Transfer Function
- Laplace Transforms, show the relationship between the 2 expressions
- Laplace transform of a one-sided full-wave rectified...
- Controlled Markov process - proper notation and set up
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Both are useful.
Personally, speaking I think the ideas are easier to convey in the continuous-time setting. For instance, the Bode plots are simpler to plot. Note also that many physical systems are continuous-time by nature. So, it makes sense to consider continuous-time systems first. Also, only the Laplace transform needs to be known.
However, controllers are implemented digitally now, which motivates to consider discrete-time systems. It requires a more advanced knowledge in signal processing than the continuous-time case. So, to me it is natural that it comes after.
However, while discretization is easy in the linear time-invariant case, this is much more complicated in the nonlinear setting or the time-varying setting. So, discretizing the whole control loop may not be easy.
Another issue with discretization is that you lose the inter-sample behavior. In other words, you do not have much information about what is happening between the samples. This may be an issue when one wants to find an optimal controller. Indeed, the discrete-time optimal controller obtained after discretization of the whole control loop may not be optimal anymore when looking at the continuous-time trajectory of the actual system in continuous time.
Finally, continuous-time disturbances may also be difficult to handle if they vary fast with respect to the sampling period. This may be a problem in the $H_2$ or the $H_\infty$ control of continuous-time processes using discrete-time controllers.
A workaround to all those problems is the consideration of a hybrid system that will consider the problem directly. Indeed, a control loop consisting of a continuous-time system and a discrete-time controller is hybrid by nature. This framework does not require any reformulation or transformation. It requires some knowledge about both continuous-time and discrete-time systems, though.
There are processes which are discrete-time in nature and those are computer systems or any systems where decisions or updates are made at specific instants. For them, it is perfectly natural to consider discrete-time controllers.