What is my lecturer saying here?

77 Views Asked by At

My lecturer gave us some exercises on Dynamics with explained solutions in case we get stuck. One of the exercises is this:

A particle of mass $\space m \space$ is attached to the end of a light inelastic string of length $\space a \space$, the other end being fixed.

Initially, the particle hangs freely vertically below the fixed end, and is given a horizontal velocity $\space u \space$. After the string has turned through an angle $\space \theta \space$, show that the tension in the string is:

$$ m \left[g \left (3 \cos{\theta} - 2 \right) + {{u^2}\over a} \right]$$

My lecturer handwrites the solutions. Here is a snippet of what he wrote and what confuses me:

enter image description here

Notice how he subbed the $\space \ddot{r} \space$ with velocity $\space u \space$, but also subbed $\space {d \dot{\theta} \over dt} \space$ with velocity $\space u \space$.

Also, I can't tell whether he wrote $\space u \space$ or $\space \dot{u} \space$. If it's the latter, isn't $\space u \space$ just a constant and not a velocity function of time? Hence making the act of dotting it pointless?

Sorry for the overload of questions, I'm really stuck. I much rather prefer typed notes to avoid issues like this.

2

There are 2 best solutions below

1
On BEST ANSWER

As I pointed out in another answer, your lecturer seems to be writing "i.e."

You claimed that in the second of your confusions that he replaced $\frac{d\dot\theta}{dt}$ with $u$. This is not what happens in that step. Here is what happens: $$\require{cancel}\begin{align}\frac {\cancel{m}}{r}\frac d{dt} (r^2\dot\theta)\hat\theta&=\cancel mg\sin(\theta)\hat\theta\\\frac 1r(2r\dot r\dot\theta+r^2\ddot\theta)&=g\sin\theta\\2\dot r\dot \theta+r\ddot\theta&=g\sin\theta\\\end{align}$$ Then if you use the fact that $r=a$ does not chance then $\dot r=0$, and this gives $$a\ddot\theta=g\sin\theta$$ which is what your lecturer looks to have written.

Also as I wrote in a comment of that answer, later in the text, the lecturer uses 9.15 in 9.13, and there is no trace of $u$ or $\dot u$. Finally, looking at the way your lecturer wrote $u$ in the last line suggests that he does not write it with a curl at the end, as all the circled ones have. So the circled ones appear to say i.e.

5
On

Unfortunately I cannot comment but I think that what you circled in red is simply the Latin abbreviation ie which corresponds to id est. It means something like that is to say and is used to explain or clarify something. See the Wikitionary for more informations.