Sorry if this is a silly question, but I had a Maths exam today and it asked me to show that 2 groups were isomorphic by "showing one isomorphism" between them.
I simply showed the identity element is isomorphic, but I did not map the other elements in G to H. Was I correct or is one isomorphism a mapping of all the elements?
I think you should review the definition of isomorphism (and probably homomorphism too). An isomorphism between $G$ and $H$ is a function $f$ from $G$ to $H$ (so, it has to be defined on all elements of $G$, not just the identity of $G$) such that
$f$ is surjective: it hits everything in $H$. (That is, for each $h\in H$ there is some $g\in G$ such that $f(g)=h$.)
$f$ is injective: $f(x)=f(y)$ implies $x=y$.
$f$ is a homomorphism: that is, $f$ respects the group structure. $f(x\cdot_Gy)=f(x)\cdot_Hf(y)$ and $f(x^{-1})=f(x)^{-1}$.
Basically, an isomorphism between $G$ and $H$ is a way of showing that $G$ and $H$ are the "same" group - but maybe with elements named differently. One classic example is the map $$f: (\mathbb{R}, +)\rightarrow (\mathbb{R}_{>0}, \times): x\mapsto e^x,$$ but there are lots of others.
When a problem asks you to "identify an isomorphism between $G$ and $H$," it's asking you to give a specific example of an isomorphism. Isomorphisms are not unique in general; for instance, $$g: (\mathbb{R}, +)\rightarrow (\mathbb{R}_{>0}, \times): x\mapsto 17^x$$ is also an isomorphism.