This is the sequence:
$a_{n+1}$ = $\sqrt{3a_{n} - 2}$
$a_{0}$ = 3
Before evaluating monotonicity I know that the sequence is converting towards either 1 or 2.
My approach is to assume it is monotonously decreasing and then:
- (observed) $a_{0} = 3 \geq \sqrt{7} = a_{1}$
- (assumed) $a_{n} \geq a_{n+1}$
- (hyptothetised) $a_{n+1} \geq a_{n+2}$
from 2. i can say
$\Rightarrow3a_{n} \geq 3a_{n+1}$
$\Rightarrow3a_{n} - 2 \geq 3a_{n+1} - 2$
$\Rightarrow\sqrt{3a_{n} - 2} \geq \sqrt{3a_{n+1} - 2}$
(i think i can take the square root if i know that it converges to either 1 or 2, correct?)
$\Rightarrow a_{n+1} \geq a_{n+2}$
Can i do it like this? If yes, is it conclusive/ is there a better way or a good alternative? If no, what is the right approach?
Thanks in advance
EDIT: Since most of the answers address the boundedness of the sequence, i should add this (sorry if it comes late): I made the assumption that for $lim(n\rightarrow\infty)$ that $a_{n} = a_{n+1}$ and arrive at
$(a_{n=\infty} - 2)(a_{n=\infty} - 1) = 0$
So i know the limit is either 1 or 2, right? Since in both cases $3a_{n} -2 > 0$, would this be enough to make my proof of monotonicity (above) valid? Or is this argument again circular?
If $a_0 =3$, then by induction $a_n > 2$ for all $n$:
$$a_{n-1} > 2 \implies 3a_{n-1}-2 > 4 \implies a_{n} =\sqrt{3a_{n-1}-2} > 2$$
Hence, your proof of monotonicity is valid (you can take the square root).
Now you have a decreasing sequence bounded below, which must converge.