Let $X=\underset{n\in\mathbb{N}}{\bigcup} X_n$ and each $X_n$ has infinite cardinality $\alpha$. What is the cardinality of $X$ ? Is this $\aleph_0\alpha$ ?
2026-04-18 20:04:00.1776542640
What is the cardinality of countable union of infinite sets?
244 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in CARDINALS
- Ordinals and cardinals in ETCS set axiomatic
- max of limit cardinals smaller than a successor cardinal bigger than $\aleph_\omega$
- If $\kappa$ is a regular cardinal then $\kappa^{<\kappa} = \max\{\kappa, 2^{<\kappa}\}$
- Intuition regarding: $\kappa^{+}=|\{\kappa\leq\alpha\lt \kappa^{+}\}|$
- On finding enough rationals (countable) to fill the uncountable number of intervals between the irrationals.
- Is the set of cardinalities totally ordered?
- Show that $n+\aleph_0=\aleph_0$
- $COF(\lambda)$ is stationary in $k$, where $\lambda < k$ is regular.
- What is the cardinality of a set of all points on a line?
- Better way to define this bijection [0,1) to (0,1)
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
This answer uses the Axiom of Choice.
In fact, $|X|=\alpha$. To prove this, we start with the following preparation.
Lemma: $|X|\leq \aleph_0\cdot\alpha$.
Proof. We show this by constructing a corresponding injection. For each $x\in X$, choose some $n(x)\in\mathbb N$ for which $x\in X_{n(x)}$ (this choice can be done without the Axiom of Choice: just take the smallest). Further, for each $n\in\mathbb N$, choose a bijection $f_n:X_n\to\alpha$ (they exist by assumption; here, the Axiom of Choice is required). Now, it is easy to see that the map $X\ni x\mapsto (n(x),f_{n(x)}(x))\in\mathbb N\times\alpha$ is injective, hence the Lemma.$\quad\small\blacksquare$
Proposition: For any ordinals $\lambda\geq\mu$, it holds that $\aleph_\lambda\cdot\aleph_\mu=\aleph_\lambda$.
Proof. This is Corollary 7.2.2 in Introduction to Set Theory by K. Hrbacek and T. Jech.$\quad\small\blacksquare$
We are now ready to prove the initial
Claim: $|X|=\alpha$.
Proof. We wish to prove both inequalities, then apply the Schröder–Bernstein Theorem. Firstly notice that, $\alpha\leq|X|$ (as $X_0\subseteq X$). Conversely, it holds that $|X|\leq \aleph_0\cdot\alpha$ by the Lemma, and $\aleph_0\cdot\alpha\leq \alpha$ by the Proposition, since $\alpha$ is equal to some aleph (by the Axiom of Choice).$\quad\small\blacksquare$