I have seen that a polynomial linear regression can have this form:
$y = c_0 + c_1 x_1 + c_2 x_2 + \dots + c_k x_k $
but I have read that the general lineal model which is a form of the multiple linear regression, can have this form:
$Y_i=b_0+b_1X_{i1}+\dots+b_pX_{ip}$
I see that almost both of them are the same. When I program in R the second case, I can use the function abline, that draws a line of "best fit" as it is called. But when I want to use it in the first case (the polynomial one) it is not possible. Why is that? If both returns a set of scattered points over the plane
Examples of both cases:
First case it could be the index of houses bought by clients over years and bimonthly. Second case, a classical one, it would be the weight prediction of a person considering the weight of their hips, arms, etc.
Why I can use abline in the second case, but not in the first one?
Thanks
You seem to be confusing "general" with "generalized". General linear models are linear models. You have $$ Y = X\beta+\varepsilon $$ where
Among such general linear models is polynomial regression. In that case, the entries $j$th column of $X$ are the $(j-1)$th powers of those in second column.
In these models, the least-squares estimate of $\beta$ is $\hat\beta= (X^TX)^{-1}X^T Y$.
A generalized linear model is not a linear model. You have a link function. For example, in logistic regression you have $$ \operatorname{logit} E(Y) = X\beta, $$ where $X$ and $\beta$ may be as above, and every element of $Y$ is $0$ or $1$, and the logit is of course $\operatorname{logit} p = \log\dfrac{p}{1-p}$. The logit function is the link function. This is not a linear model.
In these models, one usually uses maximum-likelihood estimates found by iterative numerical methods. These are generally not least-squares estimates.