What is the $\ell^2$ analogue of this $\ell^1$ property?

129 Views Asked by At

It is well known that if $T:\ell^1\to\ell^1$ is a bounded/continuous map then $$\Vert T\Vert_{op}=\sup\{\Vert Tx\Vert_1\mid x\in\ell^1\text{ and }\Vert x\Vert_1=1\}=\sup\{\Vert Te_n\Vert_1\mid n\ge1\}$$ where $\{e_n\}_{n=1}^\infty$ is the standard basis for the $\ell^p$ spaces.

However the same thing does not hold in $\ell^2$ (or $\ell^p$ for $1<p$) mainly because in the proof, some inequality depends on the $1$-norm of the sequence and it may not even be defined. So is there any "nice" set $U\subseteq\ell^2$ such that $$\Vert T\Vert_{op}=\sup\{\Vert Tx\Vert_2\mid x\in U\}$$

Thanks!

2

There are 2 best solutions below

3
On

A very nice set $U$ at which every bounded operator attains its norm is the unit sphere of $\ell_2$ $$U=\{x\in\ell_2:\|x\|_2=1\}$$ It is a matter of taste whether there is a "nicer" set than this at all in $\ell_2$. For our purposes, there is certainly no strictly smaller set at which every operator attains its norm, because given any point $x_0\in U$, there is a linear functional whose norm is attained precisely at $x_0$ and nowhere else.

0
On

The wikipedia page for the operator norm lists an equivalent definition of the operator norm of $T : V \to W,$ for any normed vector spaces $V\neq 0, W$ as $$\|T\|_{op} = \sup \left\{\|Tx\|_W : x \in V, \|x\|_V = 1\right\}$$

In particular, you can specialize $V = \ell^m, W = \ell^n.$


It seems you are mostly interested in finding a more specialized subset $V_0 \subset V$ such that $\|T\|_{op} = \sup \{\|Tx\|_W : x \in V_0\}.$

We could of course just take any dense subset of $\{x \in V : \|x\|_V = 1\},$ but this would be of arguable usefulness. Instead, the more useful thing to consider (at least for locally convex spaces) is the set of extreme points of the closed unit ball.

For $1 \leq p \leq \infty,$ $\ell^p$ is locally convex, but the set of extreme points of the closed unit ball is only strictly smaller than the boundary of the closed unit ball for $p\in\{1,\infty\}.$ This means that you shouldn't expect to have an analogous theorem for $\ell^p$ for any $1 < p < \infty.$