This is a very simple question, but I do not understand the concept. Consider $P(s,t)$ and $L$ as two stochastic matrices, where $s$,$t$ are time variables and $P(s,t)$ is the probability of the occurrence of an event at time $t$ with considering an event at time $s$. Also define norm of $P(s,t)-L$ as follows: $$||P(s,t)-L||=\sup_i \sum_j^\infty|a_{ij}|$$ What is the mean of: "$||P(s,t)-L||$ goes to zero uniformly in $s$ as $t$ goes to infinity" ?
2026-04-03 11:43:18.1775216598
What is the mean of "limit goes to zero uniformly in $s$ as $t$ goes to infinity"?
186 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in LIMITS
- How to prove $\lim_{n \rightarrow\infty} e^{-n}\sum_{k=0}^{n}\frac{n^k}{k!} = \frac{1}{2}$?
- limit points at infinity
- Calculating the radius of convergence for $\sum _{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{\left(\sqrt{ n^2+n}-\sqrt{n^2+1}\right)^n}{n^2}z^n$
- Maximal interval of existence of the IVP
- Divergence of power series at the edge
- Compute $\lim_{x\to 1^+} \lim_{n\to\infty}\frac{\ln(n!)}{n^x} $
- why can we expand an expandable function for infinite?
- Infinite surds on a number
- Show that f(x) = 2a + 3b is continuous where a and b are constants
- If $a_{1}>2$and $a_{n+1}=a_{n}^{2}-2$ then Find $\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}$ $\frac{1}{a_{1}a_{2}......a_{n}}$
Related Questions in STOCHASTIC-PROCESSES
- Interpreting stationary distribution $P_{\infty}(X,V)$ of a random process
- Probability being in the same state
- Random variables coincide
- Reference request for a lemma on the expected value of Hermitian polynomials of Gaussian random variables.
- Why does there exists a random variable $x^n(t,\omega')$ such that $x_{k_r}^n$ converges to it
- Compute the covariance of $W_t$ and $B_t=\int_0^t\mathrm{sgn}(W)dW$, for a Brownian motion $W$
- Why has $\sup_{s \in (0,t)} B_s$ the same distribution as $\sup_{s \in (0,t)} B_s-B_t$ for a Brownian motion $(B_t)_{t \geq 0}$?
- What is the name of the operation where a sequence of RV's form the parameters for the subsequent one?
- Markov property vs. transition function
- Variance of the integral of a stochastic process multiplied by a weighting function
Related Questions in UNIFORM-DISTRIBUTION
- Uniform distribution: two parts of semicircle
- What is the distribution of the modular inverse of a uniformly random element in $\mathrm{Z}_{n}\setminus\{0\}$
- Determine limits for marginal pdf after Jacobian transformation
- distribution of Z=X+Y
- integrand of norm subjected to translation
- Convergence of ratio of two sums of uniform random variables
- Variance of $T_n = \min_i \{ X_i \} + \max_i \{ X_i \}$
- $X$ and $Y$ has uniform distribution. Find $(X-Y)^2$
- The sequence $\,a_n=\lfloor \mathrm{e}^n\rfloor$ contains infinitely many odd and infinitely many even terms
- Difference between conditional expectation E(Y|X) and E(Y|X=x)
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
It means that as $t\to \infty$, the expression $\|P(s, t)-L\|$ goes towards $0$, and it does so uniformly in $s$. This means in a sense that as $t$ increases, the expression goes to $0$ for all different $s$ simultaneously.
I think this is easiest illustrated with a counterexample (using $1\times 1$ matrices, also known as real numbers). Consider $f(s, t) = e^{-(s+ t)^2}$. For any fixed $s$, as $t\to \infty$, the value of $f(s, t)$ goes toward $0$. However, for any fixed $t$ there is always somewhere where $f$ is far from $0$ (its max value is $1$). No matter how large $t$ gets, we can't get rid of that max value of $1$. We can only push it further and further out to the side. So $f(s, t)$ goes to $0$ as $t$ goes to $\infty$, but it doesn't do so uniformly in $s$.
"Converging uniformly in $s$ as $t$ goes to $\infty$" can therefore be intuitively explained as "not only does increasing $t$ make any single point on the function go towards $0$, but it makes the function as a whole (especially including max and min points) go toward $0$."
There is, of course, a formal "$\epsilon$-$\delta$" definition if you'd like: