Inquiring minds want to know. :) I read somewhere that SO(3) is not orientable but I did read somewhere that for any odd dimension N>1, SO(N) is a non-orientable manifold. If such is true I'm eager to see how.
2026-04-05 20:17:16.1775420236
What is the proof that SO(2n+1) is non-orientable for any positive integer n?
1.2k Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in LIE-GROUPS
- Best book to study Lie group theory
- Holonomy bundle is a covering space
- homomorphism between unitary groups
- On uniparametric subgroups of a Lie group
- Is it true that if a Lie group act trivially on an open subset of a manifold the action of the group is trivial (on the whole manifold)?
- Find non-zero real numbers $a,b,c,d$ such that $a^2+c^2=b^2+d^2$ and $ab+cd=0$.
- $SU(2)$ adjoint and fundamental transformations
- A finite group G acts freely on a simply connected manifold M
- $SU(3)$ irreps decomposition in subgroup irreps
- Tensors transformations under $so(4)$
Related Questions in GEOMETRIC-TOPOLOGY
- Finite covers of handlebodies?
- CW complexes are compactly generated
- Constructing a fat Cantor Set with certain property
- Homologically zero circles in smooth manifolds
- Labeled graphs with unimodular adjacency matrix
- Pseudoisotopy between nonisotopic maps
- A topological question about loops and fixed points
- "Continuity" of volume function on hyperbolic tetrahedra
- Example of path connected metric space whose hyperspace with Vietoris topology is not path connected?
- What is the pushout of $D^n \longleftarrow S^{n-1} \longrightarrow D^n$?
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Since this has sat around on MSE for an eternity (=$22$ hours!), I'll go ahead and turn my comment into an answer.
For any $n$ at all, $SO(n)$ is orientable. More generally, for any $n$ at all, $SO(n)$ is a Lie group and all Lie groups are orientable.
Since you already seem to know $SO(n)$ is a manifold, let me briefly argue it's a Lie group, that is, that multiplication and inversion are smooth. The point is that $SO(n)$ naturally sits inside of $M(n,\mathbb{R})$ which is a vector space of dimension $n^2$. Elements of $M(n,\mathbb{R})$ can be multiplied in the usual way and the key fact is that each coordinate of $AB$ is given by a polynomial in the entries of $A$ and $B$. In particular, multiplication on $M(n,\mathbb{R})$ is smooth and so, by restriction it is smooth on $SO(n)$ as well.
Inversion, when defined, is given by a rational function of the entries of the matrix (Cramer's rule), so is smooth so long as it is defined. Hence, by restricting to $SO(n)$ (where everything is invertible), we see that inversion is also smooth.
Thus, we need only argue that all Lie groups are orientable. One definition of orientability that I like is that a manifold is orientable if it has a nonvanishing volume form at every point. (This can be shown to be equivalent to any of the other definitions of orientability).
To see that a Lie group has a non-vanishing volume form, note that $T_e G$ (where $e\in G$ is the identity) has one because it's just a vector space. Choose one and call it $\omega$. To define a non-vanishing volume form at every point, define $\Omega(g) = L_{g^{-1}}^\ast \omega$ where $L_g:G\rightarrow G$ denotes left multiplication: $L_g(h) = gh$. Since $L_{g^{-1}}$ is a diffeomorphism, it maps nonzero forms to nonzero forms, so $\Omega$ is non-vanishing.