I am a mathematics student.I am studying linear algebra in which I have dual spaces,annihilators and other related concepts.I want to know what is the motivation behind defining annihilator of a subspace which is $W^0=\{\phi\in V^*: W\subset \operatorname{Ker}\phi\}$. I have seen the result $\dim W^0=\dim V-\dim W$,but I cannot understand what is the exact correlation between $W$ and its annihilator $W^0$. Can someone give me some motivation behind defining dual spaces and annihilators.One motivation of defining dual basis I think is to consider the transpose,but I am not sure.For annihilators the motivation is I think from orthogonal complement of inner product.I am also confused with the notions $V/W^0\simeq W$ or $(V/W)^*\simeq W^0$.
2026-03-30 15:14:56.1774883696
What is the significance of annihilator subspace?
267 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in LINEAR-ALGEBRA
- An underdetermined system derived for rotated coordinate system
- How to prove the following equality with matrix norm?
- Alternate basis for a subspace of $\mathcal P_3(\mathbb R)$?
- Why the derivative of $T(\gamma(s))$ is $T$ if this composition is not a linear transformation?
- Why is necessary ask $F$ to be infinite in order to obtain: $ f(v)=0$ for all $ f\in V^* \implies v=0 $
- I don't understand this $\left(\left[T\right]^B_C\right)^{-1}=\left[T^{-1}\right]^C_B$
- Summation in subsets
- $C=AB-BA$. If $CA=AC$, then $C$ is not invertible.
- Basis of span in $R^4$
- Prove if A is regular skew symmetric, I+A is regular (with obstacles)
Related Questions in DUAL-SPACES
- Why is necessary ask $F$ to be infinite in order to obtain: $ f(v)=0$ for all $ f\in V^* \implies v=0 $
- How to conclude that $\ell_\infty$ is not separable from this exercise?
- Dual of linear map into a tensor product
- Basis of vector spaces in perfect pairing
- How to find a dual basis given a basis?
- $T \in \mathcal L(V,W)$ is surjective $\iff ($range $T)^0 = \{0\}$
- Restrict $g$ to a dense subclass in $\|f\|_p=\text{sup}\{|\int_Xfg|:\|g\|_{p'}\leq 1\}$
- $(\text{Im}(T^*))^0 = \ker(T)$?
- Unit ball in dual space is weak*separable
- Co- and contravariance of vectors vs co- and contravariant functors
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Question:"I have seen the result $dim(W_0)=dim(V)−dim(W)$,but I cannot understand what is the exact correlation between $W$ and its annihilator $W_0$. Can someone give me some motivation behind defining dual spaces and annihilators.One motivation of defining dual basis I think is to consider the transpose,but I am not sure.For annihilators the motivation is I think from orthogonal complement of inner product."
Answer: Given a vector subspace $W \subseteq V$ and let $i: W \rightarrow V$ be the inclusion map. You get an exact sequence of $k$-vector spaces
$$0 \rightarrow W \rightarrow V \rightarrow V/W \rightarrow 0$$
and when you dualize this sequence you get an exact sequence
$$0 \rightarrow (V/W)^* \rightarrow V^* \rightarrow^{i^*} W^* \rightarrow 0$$
where the map $i^*$ is the induced map: By definition $i^*(\phi):=\phi \circ i$.
From this you may prove that there are equalities $W^0 = ker (i^*) = (V/W)^*$ as subspaces of $V^*$ as follows: If $i^*(\phi):= \phi \circ i=0$ it follows $\phi(W)=0$ hence $\phi \in W^0$. Conversely if $\phi \in W^0$ it follows $\phi(W)=0$ and hence $\phi \in i^*$. From this it follows that
$$dim(W^0)=dim((V/W)^*)=dim(V^*)-dim(W^*)=dim(V)-dim(W).$$
You need to know what a quotient vector space is and what the dual vector space is. You do not need an inner product for this to hold.
Comment: I am also confused with the notions $V/W^0\simeq W$ or $(V/W)^*\simeq W^0$.
Note: Given any inclusion of vector spaces $i: W \rightarrow V$ you may construct the "quotient vector space" $V/W$. The sub space $W \subseteq V$ defines an equivalence relation on the set of vectors $v\in V$: two vectors $u,v$ are equivalent $u \cong v$ iff $u-v \in W$. The set of equivalence classes is denoted $V/W$ and given a vector $v\in V$ we denote by $[v]$ the equivalence class of $v$. This is the class $[v]:=\{v+u: u\in W\}$. The set of equivalence classes $V/W$ is naturally a $k$-vector space and there is a canonical map $p:V \rightarrow V/W$ of $k$-vector spaces defined by $p(v):=[v]$. It has kernel $ker(p)=W$.