Can anybody fully describe the three dimensional surface represented by the equation $a/x+b/y+c/z=0$ where $a,b,c$ are real numbers?
2026-04-09 13:21:22.1775740882
what is the surface representing $a/x+b/y+c/z=0$?
63 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in 3D
- Visualization of Projective Space
- Approximate spline equation with Wolfram Mathematica
- Three-Dimensional coordinate system
- Volume of sphere split into eight sections?
- Largest Cube that fits the space between two Spheres?
- Is $ABC$ similar with $A'B'C'$, where $A', B', C'$ are the projections of $A, B, C $ on a plane $\pi $.
- Intersection of a facet and a plane
- Distance from center of sphere to apex of pyramid?
- Looking for hints on the below 3D geometry problem.
- Finding the Euler angle/axis from a 2 axes rotation but that lies on the original 2 axes' plane
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
With the origin and the axes removed, it is the cone $$ ayz + b zx + c xy = 0. $$ Note that, if two out of three of $x,y,z$ are zero, then the form is zero. For example, if $x,y$ are both zero, we are on the $z$ axis somewhere. This point is in the cone, it is just not allowed in the original description of the surface, which prohibited any coordinate being zero.
The Hessian matrix of the quadratic form is $$ H = \left( \begin{array}{ccc} 0 & c & b \\ c & 0 & a \\ b & a & 0 \\ \end{array} \right) $$ For unspecified values of $a,b,c$ the eigenvalues are unpleasant, $$ \lambda^3 - \left(a^2 + b^2 + c^2 \right) \lambda - 2abc = 0. $$ It is possible, with integers $a,b,c,$ to get at least one rational eigenvalue; when $a=b,$ the eigenvalues are $(-c, \frac{c \pm \sqrt{8a^2 + c^2}}{2})$ In general, or using the symbols, this is Casus Irreducibilis. Hmmm. This point seems worth further investigation...
On the other hand, for chosen values of $a,b,c,$ things sometimes come out nicely. For example, with $a=b=c=1,$ we have $$ H = \left( \begin{array}{ccc} 0 & 1 & 1 \\ 1 & 0 & 1 \\ 1 & 1 & 0 \\ \end{array} \right) $$ and the eigenvalues are $-1,-1,2.$ In this case, as rows, the eigenvectors (normalized) can be taken as $(1,1,1) / \sqrt 3, \; \; $ $(-1,1,0) / \sqrt 2, \; \; $ $(-1,-1,2) / \sqrt 6. \; \; $
If we were setting the quadratic form to a nonzero constant, we would need to know the signs of the eigenvalues, as in Sylvester's Law of Inertia, to say whether we had a hyperboloid of one or two sheets. Since we are setting to zero, this does not matter: it is just the cone, although the origin and axes are removed because the original problem did not allow the variables to be zero.