In terms of purported proof of Atiyah's Riemann Hypothesis, my question is what is the Todd function that seems to be very important in the proof of Riemann's Hypothesis?
2026-03-25 01:22:22.1774401742
What is the Todd's function in Atiyah's paper?
14.4k Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in ANALYTIC-NUMBER-THEORY
- Justify an approximation of $\sum_{n=1}^\infty G_n/\binom{\frac{n}{2}+\frac{1}{2}}{\frac{n}{2}}$, where $G_n$ denotes the Gregory coefficients
- Is there a trigonometric identity that implies the Riemann Hypothesis?
- question regarding nth prime related to Bertrands postulate.
- Alternating sequence of ascending power of 2
- Reference for proof of Landau's prime ideal theorem (English)
- Does converge $\sum_{n=2}^\infty\frac{1}{\varphi(p_n-2)-1+p_n}$, where $\varphi(n)$ is the Euler's totient function and $p_n$ the $n$th prime number?
- On the behaviour of $\frac{1}{N}\sum_{k=1}^N\frac{\pi(\varphi(k)+N)}{\varphi(\pi(k)+N)}$ as $N\to\infty$
- Analytic function to find k-almost primes from prime factorization
- Easy way to prove that the number of primes up to $n$ is $\Omega(n^{\epsilon})$
- Eisenstein Series, discriminant and cusp forms
Related Questions in FAKE-PROOFS
- Fake induction, can't find flaw, every graph with zero edges is connected
- A possible proof of Brocard’s Problem?
- How can I express a resulting discrepancy? (Proving $\varphi(x \in G) = x^{-1}$ is an automorphism iff G is abelian)
- An irreducible topological space $X$ admits a constant sheaf iff it is indiscrete.
- Difference between minus one and plus one induction?
- Every group is solvable, fake proof.
- If $ImA = (ImB)^{\bot}$ then $B^TA = 0$
- $\cos(\frac{2 \pi}{n}) = 1 \ \forall n \geq 1$? Need help in finding my mistake.
- Do all series whose terms are differences between a sequence and its limit diverge?
- Mistake in the wording of a question about the cardinality of a set of primes?
Related Questions in RIEMANN-HYPOTHESIS
- Verify the Riemann Hypothesis for first 1000 zeros.
- Reference for von Koch's 1901 theorem (RH characterization)
- How to contour integrate the Riemann Zeta function with a goal to verify the Riemann hypothesis?
- contributions of Riemann Hypothesis to physics if the Riemann zeta function is a solution for known differential equation?
- Heuristics on the asymptotic behaviour of the divisor funcion
- How to locate zeros of the Riemann Zeta function?
- Questions on Riemann's Prime-Power Counting Function $\Pi(x)$ and a Related Staircase Function
- Questions on Prime Counting Functions, Explicit Formulas, and Related Zeta Functions
- What is upper bound for the largest prime in a counter-example for robin's inequality
- How much of the Riemann Hypothesis has been solved?
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
While there might be an interesting question here about the older math that Atiyah references, it is worth pointing out what Atiyah actually says about the function $T$:
$T : \mathbb{C} \to \mathbb{C}$ (this is in Section 3.4 of the longer paper "The Fine Structure Constant").
$T$ is "real" (see 2.2 of the shorter paper "The Riemann Hypothesis" - it doesn't mean "real-valued").
$T(1) = 1$ (2.3 of the shorter paper "The Riemann Hypothesis").
On any compact, convex set $K$, $T$ is a polynomial of some degree and the degree is in principle allowed to depend on the set $K$ (this is in the start of Section 2).
If $f$ and $g$ are power series with no constant term then $$ T\Bigl( 1 + f(s) + g(s) + f(s)g(s)\Bigr) = T\Bigl(1 + f(s) + g(s)\Bigr) $$ (this is 2.6 of shorter paper).
The following proof is from a Redditor : Set $f(s) = e^s - 1$ and $g(s) = 1 - e^s$. Point 5. then implies that $$ T\Bigl( 1 + e^s - 1 + 1 - e^s + (e^s - 1)(1 - e^s)\Bigr) = T(1) $$ i.e.(using 3.): $$ T\Bigl( e^s(2-e^s))\Bigr) = 1. $$ Now notice that the function $e^s(2-e^s)\rvert_{\mathbb{R}}$ takes any value in $(-\infty,1)$. To see this claim you can solve $$ e^x(2-e^x) = y\ \Leftrightarrow e^{2x} - 2e^x + y = 0 $$ by using the quadratic formula and taking logarithms to get a real solution when $y < 1$. This shows that $T\rvert_{(-\infty,1)}$ is constant.
OK so now take a compact, convex set $K \subset \{ \mathrm{Re}(z) < 1\}$ that contains an interval on the real line, i.e. $K$ contains a subinterval $I$ of $(-\infty,1)$. From the properties 2. and 4. we know that $T\rvert_K$ is a polynomial with real coefficients. But we also know it is constant on $I$ which means $T \rvert_K$ is constant.
Since $K$ was arbitrary we can easily exhaust$ \{ \mathrm{Re}(z) < 1\}$ by compact, convex sets to show that $T$ is constant on $\{ \mathrm{Re}(z) < 1\}$, in particular, this includes the critical strip.