What is wrong with this proof that the power set of natural numbers is countable?

509 Views Asked by At

I came up with a proof that the power set of natural numbers is countable, which obviously must be a wrong proof.

Here is a procedure to create a one-on-one correspondence between the natural numbers and the elements of its power set.

Starting with the power-set-element-counter k = 1. Go through all the natural numbers x in order (x = 1, x=2, etc), and for each x do the following:

  • Denote P(x) to be the set of all subsets of the set of natural numbers up to x: P(x) = Power{1,...,x}.
  • Denote P*(x) to be the the set of elements of P(x), excluding the elements in P(x-1).
  • P*(x) is finite, since the cardinality of a power set of a finite set is also finite. Denote the cardinality of P*(x) as "c". Hence we can pair the natural numbers, starting with k, to each of the elements in P*(x). After each pair that is paired, increment k = k+1. in the end, k will be incremented by c.
  • set x = x+1, and start the cycle over again.

This cycle should produce a bijection between the natural numbers and the elements of the power set of natural numbers. What is wrong with this proof?

1

There are 1 best solutions below

4
On BEST ANSWER

Every single subset your procedure produces is finite. You've missed ALL of the infinite subsets. It turns out there's a whopping great lot of infinite subsets.