$(2\Bbb{Z} + 1)\cup 3\Bbb{Z} = 2\Bbb{Z} \cup 3\Bbb{Z} + 3$
Proof:
$$ \begin{align*} 2\Bbb{Z} &= \bullet \circ \bullet \circ \bullet \circ \bullet \circ \dots \\ 3\Bbb{Z} &= \bullet \circ \circ \bullet \circ \circ \bullet \circ \dots \\ 2\Bbb{Z}+1 &= \circ \bullet \circ \bullet \circ \bullet \circ \bullet \dots \\ 2\Bbb{Z} \cup 3\Bbb{Z} &= \bullet \circ \bullet \bullet \bullet \circ \bullet \circ \dots \\ (2\Bbb{Z} + 1)\cup 3\Bbb{Z} &= \bullet \bullet \circ \bullet \circ\bullet\bullet\bullet \dots \end{align*} $$ Shift the last one by $\pm 3$. Conclude. That's a visual proof. But what is the underlying algebra?
Notice that the sets $2\mathbb Z$ and $3\mathbb Z$ (as well as translations thereof) are both periodic and share $6$ as a period - that is, you can reduce the problem mod $6$ and note that, since your sets are equal mod $6$ they are equal in general. This essentially tells us that your visual proof suffices as a rigorous one.
To give a more algebraic proof of your identity though, one might note that we can start with the expression $$2\mathbb Z \cup 3\mathbb Z + 3$$ and then "distributing" the $3$ gives the equivalent $$(2\mathbb Z + 3) \cup (3\mathbb Z + 3)$$ and noting that $a\mathbb Z + b = a\mathbb Z + (b+na)$ for any $n$, since those sets are "periodic". Reducing both sets in parenthesis yields the desired $$(2\mathbb Z + 1) \cup 3\mathbb Z.$$