Please check my answer:
$\forall x[H_x \supset W_x ]$ which translates as "For all x, if x is he (goes to work) then he wears suit to work" (Bold ones are the symbols I pickedup)
Venn would a diagram for an A proposition shown as:
Please check my answer:
$\forall x[H_x \supset W_x ]$ which translates as "For all x, if x is he (goes to work) then he wears suit to work" (Bold ones are the symbols I pickedup)
Venn would a diagram for an A proposition shown as:
That's a pretty weird symbolization key:
$Hx$: $x$ is 'He'
$Wx$: $x$ always wears a suit to work
Indeed, as such, your logic sentence, when translated back into English, would be: 'All that are 'he' always wear a suit to work'
I would say: if the 'he' is some specific person, then use an individual constant for this person, say $h$
Then, you can use the following more 'natural' predicates:
$Wx$: $x$ goes to work
$Sx$: $x$ wears a suit
And with that, we can symbolize the sentence as:
$Wh \to Sh$
Now, this seems to be missing the 'always' part though ... but note that that is about points in time, not people
So, to add that in, you can do:
$Wxt$: $x$ goes to work at time $t$
$Sxt$: $x$ wears a suit at time $t$
And then the translation is:
$\forall t (Wht \to Sht)$
(I'll forgo making a remark on what that last translation looks like ...)