In what particular situation would the following be true?
$AB = B^TA$
where $A$ is symmetrical, $B$ is not.
I also know that $BB = B$.
In what particular situation would the following be true?
$AB = B^TA$
where $A$ is symmetrical, $B$ is not.
I also know that $BB = B$.
On
Let us do it in dimension $2\times 2$.
$A=\pmatrix{a &b\\ b&c}$ and $B=\pmatrix{s&p\\q&r}$.
The conditions on $B$ are:
It's not symmetric
It's a projection
$AB$ is symmetric
First deduction: $r+s= 1$. Indeed, if not then $p=q=0$ but we know that $p\neq q$.
Second deduction: $r$ and $s$ are the two solutions to the equation $x^2-x+pq=0$. That is $$r,s=\frac{1\pm \sqrt{1-4pq}}{2}$$ and in particular, we must have $1-4pq\geq 0$.
Third deduction: $$ap+b\sqrt{1-4pq}=qc$$
From this we can derive a method to produce all possible matrices $B$:
Example: pick $q=0$. Assuming $a\neq 0$, the relevant solution to the quadratic equation is $p=-\frac ba$. Assuming $b\neq 0$ we have $p\neq q$. Here, $1-4pq\geq 0$ comes for free. $r=1$ and $s=0$. This gives $$B=\pmatrix{0 & -\frac ba\\ 0 & 1}$$ You can check that $AB$ is symmetric as required: $$\pmatrix{a &b\\ b&c}\pmatrix{0 & -\frac ba\\ 0 & 1}=\pmatrix{0 &0\\ 0&c-\frac{b^2}{a}}$$ and that the other requirements are met as well.
Conclusion: In general, there are a lot of such matrices (potentially several $1$-parameter families, which can be described explicitly at least in dimension $2$).
We know that $$(AB)^T=B^TA^T=B^TA=AB$$therefore the symmetry of $AB$ is an equivalent condition. No more general condition can be implied.