When is it true that if a section vanishes on a dense open set then it is the zero global section?

748 Views Asked by At

In other words, when do global sections act like continuous functions? Is it true on an integral scheme?

I am asking this question because I am wondering whether it is possible for a non-zero global section on an integral scheme $(X,O_X)$ to vanish on a non-empty set of stalks. I mean, if $s \in O_X(X)$ with $s_x=0 \in O_{X,x}$ for some $x$ then $s$ vanishes on some open set which is dense, and if my claim is true then it is zero. This would imply that for any $s \in O_X(X),$ ($s_x=0$ for some $x$) $\Rightarrow(s = 0)$. Is this true?

If $X = \operatorname{Spec}A$ for $A$ some integral ring, then a non-zero global section is never going to vanish at some stalk since $A$ integral means $A$ contains no non-zero zero-divisors, so $A$ injects in $A_p$. I'm assuming $A= O_X(X) \rightarrow O_{X,x} = A_x$ is the canonical injection. I don't know actually...

If $X$ is integral then I guess $X$ can be covered with open affine subsets $\operatorname{Spec}A_i$ with $A_i$ integral. If I take a non-zero global section then its restriction $s_i$ to some $\operatorname{Spec}A_i$ is also going to be non-zero everywhere on $\operatorname{Spec}A_i$ which is dense. So $s$ would be non-zero on a dense open subset. So I guess it cannot also vanish at some stalk, else it would also vanish on a dense open subset which is a contradiction since two dense open subsets always intersect non-trivially, is it sound?

1

There are 1 best solutions below

1
On BEST ANSWER

I am asking this question because I am wondering whether it is possible for a non-zero global section on an integral scheme $(X,O_X)$ to vanish on a non-empty set of stalks. I mean, if $s \in O_X(X)$ with $s_x=0 \in O_{X,x}$ for some $x$ then $s$ vanishes on some open set which is dense, and if my claim is true then it is zero. This would imply that for any $s \in O_X(X),$ ($s_x=0$ for some $x$) $\Rightarrow(s = 0)$. Is this true?

Yes.

If $X = \operatorname{Spec}A$ for $A$ some integral ring, then a non-zero global section is never going to vanish at some stalk since $A$ integral means $A$ contains no non-zero zero-divisors, so $A$ injects in $A_p$. I'm assuming $A= O_X(X) \rightarrow O_{X,x} = A_x$ is the canonical injection. I don't know actually...

Yes, the map called "taking stalks" is the canonical injection $A\to A_p$. This reasoning is perfectly correct.

If $X$ is integral then I guess $X$ can be covered with open affine subsets $\operatorname{Spec}A_i$ with $A_i$ integral. If I take a non-zero global section then its restriction $s_i$ to some $\operatorname{Spec}A_i$ is also going to be non-zero everywhere on $\operatorname{Spec}A_i$ which is dense. So $s$ would be non-zero on a dense open subset. So I guess it cannot also vanish at some stalk, else it would also vanish on a dense open subset which is a contradiction since two dense open subsets always intersect non-trivially, is it sound?

This proof is essentially correct. There are some slight adjustments that can be made here to make this clearer. Suppose there is a nonzero global section $s\in \mathcal{O}_X(X)$. Then there exists a nonempty affine open $U$ so that $s|_U$ is nonzero: if not, then $s=0$ as the affine opens form an open covering on which $s$ restricts to zero, so $s=0$ by the sheaf property. Now run the proof from paragraph 2: $s_u\neq 0$ for any $u\in U$. On the other hand, if $s=0$ on some other affine open $U'$, then $s_x=0$ and $s_x\neq 0$ for all $x\in U\cap U'\neq \emptyset$, a contradiction. So $s$ restricts to a nonzero section on every affine open, and by the previous proof is nonzero in every stalk.