Let $\lVert \cdot \rVert$ denote the operator 2-norm of a matrix. It is well-known that for any two matrices $A \in \mathbb{R}^{n \times p}$ and $B \in \mathbb{R}^{p \times n}$ we have $$\lVert AB \rVert \leq \lVert A \rVert \lVert B \rVert.$$ I am interested to know when the above inequality is an equality. One obvious scenario is when either of $A$ or $B$ is an identity matrix (upto a scalar multiple). However, is this the only possible case? Does there exist a characterization of $A$ and $B$ when equality holds? Any references to relevant research papers are welcome.
2026-03-27 23:01:56.1774652516
When is the operator norm inequality for matrix product an equality?
1.4k Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in LINEAR-ALGEBRA
- An underdetermined system derived for rotated coordinate system
- How to prove the following equality with matrix norm?
- Alternate basis for a subspace of $\mathcal P_3(\mathbb R)$?
- Why the derivative of $T(\gamma(s))$ is $T$ if this composition is not a linear transformation?
- Why is necessary ask $F$ to be infinite in order to obtain: $ f(v)=0$ for all $ f\in V^* \implies v=0 $
- I don't understand this $\left(\left[T\right]^B_C\right)^{-1}=\left[T^{-1}\right]^C_B$
- Summation in subsets
- $C=AB-BA$. If $CA=AC$, then $C$ is not invertible.
- Basis of span in $R^4$
- Prove if A is regular skew symmetric, I+A is regular (with obstacles)
Related Questions in MATRICES
- How to prove the following equality with matrix norm?
- I don't understand this $\left(\left[T\right]^B_C\right)^{-1}=\left[T^{-1}\right]^C_B$
- Powers of a simple matrix and Catalan numbers
- Gradient of Cost Function To Find Matrix Factorization
- Particular commutator matrix is strictly lower triangular, or at least annihilates last base vector
- Inverse of a triangular-by-block $3 \times 3$ matrix
- Form square matrix out of a non square matrix to calculate determinant
- Extending a linear action to monomials of higher degree
- Eiegenspectrum on subtracting a diagonal matrix
- For a $G$ a finite subgroup of $\mathbb{GL}_2(\mathbb{R})$ of rank $3$, show that $f^2 = \textrm{Id}$ for all $f \in G$
Related Questions in MATRIX-NORMS
- Inequality regarding norm of a positive definite matrix
- Operator norm calculation for simple matrix
- Equivalence of computing trace norm of matrix
- Spectral norm minimization
- Frobenius and operator norms of rank 1 matrices
- Prove the induced matrix norm $\|A\|_\infty = \max_i \| a^*_i \|_1$
- $l_2 \rightarrow l_\infty$ induced matrix norm
- Is it possible to upper bound this family of matrices in operator norm?
- Upper bound this family of matrices in induced $2$-norm
- Operator norm (induced $2$-norm) of a Kronecker tensor
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
The matrix $A \in \mathbb R^{n \times p}$ represents a linear map from $V = \mathbb R^n $ to $W = \mathbb R^p $ which without ambiguity we can denote as $A: V \to W$
Similarly $B \in \mathbb R^{p \times n}$ represents $B: W \to V$, and $A \circ B: W \to W$
The 2-norm of a matrix is the same as operator norm of the linear map that it represents (see, e.g. https://math.stackexchange.com/q/482191 ), where the operator norm of, for example, $A$ is defined as $||A|| = sup _{0 \ne v \in V} (||Av||_W/||v||_V)$.
Since the spaces here are finite dimensional, it follows that any operator attains its norm, e.g. for $A$, there is at least one $v \in V$ with $||Av|| = ||A||.||v||$
(Proof: use equivalent definition of $||A|| = sup_{||v|| = 1} (||Av||) $then since the unit ball is compact in finite dimensions and $A$ is continuous then ||Av|| attains its maximum on the unit ball.)
Then for any $A$ we can define a set $S_A = \{v \in V: ||A v|| = ||A||.||v||\}$ and similarly, $S_B$.
If we now want $||A B|| = ||A||.||B||$ then we require a vector $w \in W$ with $||w|| = ||ABw|| = ||A(B w)||$ which can happen iff $w \in S_B$ and $Bw \in S_A$, i.e. $S_{AB} = S_A \cap B(S_B) \ne 0$.
I don't think that this makes for a very interesting property of $A, B$.
For example let $\{v_i\}_{i=1, n}$ be a basis of unit length vectors for $V$ and $\{w_i\}_{i=1, p}$ for $W$.
Define $B$ by $B(w_1) = v_2$ and $B(w_i) = 0 $ otherwise. Define $A$ by $A(v_2) = w_3$ and $A(v_i) = 0 $ otherwise.
Then $||A|| = ||B|| = ||A \circ B|| = 1$