When proving if a subset is a subspace, can I prove closure under addition and multiplication in a single proof?

24.1k Views Asked by At

I'm learning about proving whether a subset of a vector space is a subspace.

It is my understanding that to be a subspace this subset must:

  • Have the $0$ vector.
  • Be closed under addition (add two elements and you get another element in the subset).
  • Be closed under multiplication by a scalar (one element by any scalar yields another element in the subset).

Have a subset in $\mathbb{R}^3$:

$$S = \{(t-2s,-s,t) \ / \ t,s \in \mathbb{R}\}$$

Prove that it is a subspace of $\mathbb{R}^3$.


Does it have the $0$ vector?

Well yeah, take $t = s = 0$ and you get $(0,0,0).$

Is it closed under addition?

We want to show that

$$x + y \in S$$

For some $x,y \in S$.

So we got

$$x = (t_1-2s_1,-s_1,t_1)\\ y = (t_2-2s_2,-s_2,t_2)$$

Then

$$x + y = (t_1-2s_1,-s_1,t_1) + (t_2-2s_2,-s_2,t_2)\\ (t_1+t_2-2s_1-2s_2 , -s_1-s_2, t_1+t_2)\\$$

Now let

$$a = t_1+t_2\\ b = s_1+s_2\\$$

So the above expression would be

$$(a-2b, -b, a)$$

Since $a,b \in \mathbb{R}$, we prove that it is closed under addition.

Is it closed under multiplication?

We want to show that

$$x\cdot r \in S$$

For some $x\in S, r \in \mathbb{R}$.

Have

$$x = (t-2s, -s, t)$$

Then

$$x \cdot r = (r\cdot(t-2s) , r\cdot -s, r\cdot t)\\ (tr-2sr , -sr , tr)$$

Let

$$a = tr\\ b = sr$$

We would have

$$(a-2b, -b, a)$$

Since $a,b\in\mathbb{R}$, this is also closed under multiplication.


I have a doubt:

Somebody also solved this, but instead of proving the addition and the multiplication closures separately, they did it in a single proof rather than two. They proved something like

Have $x,y \in S$ and some $r \in \mathbb{R}$, we want to prove that $$x + r\cdot y \in S$$

Then they proceeded to do something similar as any of the two proofs I did above (evaluate and then assign constants $a$ and $b$). Does that mean that, for future proofs, does it suffice to prove $x + r\cdot y \in S$ to prove that it is a subspace? Is there no need to do it separately?

1

There are 1 best solutions below

3
On BEST ANSWER

Yes. If r=1 then you are proving that it is closed under addition and if x=0 you are proving that it is closed under product by scalars. So it is a way to unify both questions.