On p. 39 of James and Liebeck's book "Representations and Characters of Groups" The term FG module is defined for F a field, G a group V a vectors space and an action of G on V is defined.
Where is the module in all this? My understanding is that a module is a vector space with multiplication by a ring (instead of a field). A group is not a Ring although it operates on V.
Where is a classically defined module in all this? Perhaps FG module is just a term of art
If $R$ is a ring, and $G$ is a group, then the group ring $\pmb{RG}$ is the ring of formal sums $$ RG \stackrel{\text{def}}{=} \bigg\{\widetilde\sum_{g\in G}r_gg : r_g\in R,\ g\in G\bigg\}, $$ where $\widetilde\sum$ means that all but finitely many summands are $0$. Addition is defined componentwise, and multiplication is handled like it is for polynomials.
Specializing to the case where $R = F$ is a field, $FG$ is still a ring, and if $V$ is an $F$-vector space on which $G$ acts, then $V$ is naturally an $FG$-module, where we define the module action for $\widetilde \sum_{g\in G}r_gg\in FG$ and $v\in V$ by $$ \bigg(\widetilde \sum_{g\in G}r_gg\bigg)\cdot v\ \stackrel{\text{def}}{=} \ \widetilde\sum_{g\in G}r_g(g\cdot v). $$ Note the $\cdot$ on the right-hand side of this equation is the action of $G$ on $V$.