Suppose that $\{X_n\}$ are i.i.d. random variables with $\mathbb{P}(X_n=0)=\mathbb{P}(X_n=1)=1/2$. Let $Y_n=X_n+X_{n-1}$ and $Z_n=2X_n+X_{n-1}$. Why $\{Z_n\}$ is Markov chain but $\{Y_n\}$ is not?
2026-03-27 14:46:49.1774622809
Whether the followings are Markov Chain
63 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in MARKOV-CHAINS
- Calculating probabilities using Markov chains.
- Probability being in the same state
- Random walk on $\mathbb{Z}^2$
- Polya's Urn and Conditional Independence
- Markov Chain never reaches a state
- Finding a mixture of 1st and 0'th order Markov models that is closest to an empirical distribution
- Find probability function of random walk, stochastic processes
- Generating cycles on a strongly connected graph
- Will be this random walk a Markov chain?
- An irreducible Markov chain cannot have an absorbing state
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
I will assume that $X_0 = 0$.
Why $Y_n$ is not Markov: Suppose $X_1 = 1, X_2 = 0$. Note that $Y_2 = 1$. Since $Y_3 = 0 + X_3$, we see that $Y_3$ will be $0$ or $1$ with equal probability. Now, suppose on the other hand that $X_1 = 0, X_2 = 1$. Again, $Y_2 = 1$ -- but this time, $Y_3 = 1 + X_3$, so it is either $1$ or $2$ with equal probability.
In short: $Y_n$ is not Markov because $\mathbb P(Y_3 = 2 \mid Y_2 = 1, Y_1 = 1) = 0$ but $\mathbb P(Y_3 = 2 \mid Y_2 = 1, Y_1 = 0) = 1/2$.
Why $Z_n$ is Markov: knowing the value of $Z_n$ completely determines both $X_n$ and $X_{n-1}$. (The four possible values of $Z_n$ are $0, 1, 2, 3$.) Thus, if you know $Z_n$, you can completely determine the distribution of $Z_{n+1}$ without ever explicitly needing to know $Z_{n-1}$. For instance: if $Z_2 = 2$, this requires that $X_1 = 0$ and $X_2 = 1$. Thus, $Z_3$ will be $2 X_3 + 1$, which has a well-defined probability distribution and does not require us to know the explicit value of $Z_1$. That's the essential distinction from the $Y_n$ process.