Recently we were introduced to the concept of vectors in our class, and we learnt about dot products and cross products.I do know that $a\times b$ yields the area of the parallelogram formed by the two vectors. What I struggle to understand is why taking the determinant leads to area of the parallelogram, i.e. how does the following: $$ \begin{vmatrix} i & j & k \\ a_{x}&a_{y}&a_{z} \\ b_{x}&b_{y} &b_{z} \\ \end{vmatrix} $$ yields a vector which is perpendicular to both $a$ and $b$, and also has a magnitude$=ab sin(\theta)$? How are they connected ?
2026-03-27 17:40:27.1774633227
Why cross product gives area of parallelogram formed by two vectors
283 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in VECTORS
- Proof that $\left(\vec a \times \vec b \right) \times \vec a = 0$ using index notation.
- Constrain coordinates of a point into a circle
- Why is the derivative of a vector in polar form the cross product?
- Why does AB+BC=AC when adding vectors?
- Prove if the following vectors are orthonormal set
- Stokes theorem integral, normal vector confusion
- Finding a unit vector that gives the maximum directional derivative of a vector field
- Given two non-diagonal points of a square, find the other 2 in closed form
- $dr$ in polar co-ordinates
- How to find reflection of $(a,b)$ along $y=x, y = -x$
Related Questions in DETERMINANT
- Form square matrix out of a non square matrix to calculate determinant
- Let $T:V\to W$ on finite dimensional vector spaces, is it possible to use the determinant to determine that $T$ is invertible.
- Optimization over images of column-orthogonal matrices through rotations and reflections
- Effect of adding a zero row and column on the eigenvalues of a matrix
- Geometric intuition behind determinant properties
- Help with proof or counterexample: $A^3=0 \implies I_n+A$ is invertible
- Prove that every matrix $\in\mathbb{R}^{3\times3}$ with determinant equal 6 can be written as $AB$, when $|B|=1$ and $A$ is the given matrix.
- Properties of determinant exponent
- How to determine the characteristic polynomial of the $4\times4$ real matrix of ones?
- The determinant of the sum of a positive definite matrix with a symmetric singular matrix
Related Questions in CROSS-PRODUCT
- Proof that $\left(\vec a \times \vec b \right) \times \vec a = 0$ using index notation.
- Why is the derivative of a vector in polar form the cross product?
- Calculus III Vector distance problem.
- linear algebra - Parallel vectors
- Geometry of the plane in 3D and cross product
- derivative of cross product of vectors with respect to vector
- Finding perpendicular and parallel vectors
- Why is the unit vector negative when solving $\sin(a-b) = \sin(a)\cos(b) - \cos(a)\sin(b)$?
- A question about cross product
- Linear Algebra: Cross Product w/ Matrices
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
After reading through others' responses and spending some more time on the problem I have come up with an explanation of my own for this question which I posted and am leaving it as answer over here for public knowledge and introspection.
The determinant method of finding the cross product is basically an abuse of the notation, as explained in this answer, also cited earlier in one of the replies. Ideally a determinant like this should give the volume of the parallelpiped formed by the vector $a,b$ and the vector $\hat{i}+\hat{j}+\hat{k}.$
When we calculate the magnitude of this vector, we perform the following calculation:
$$
|c|=\sqrt{{(a_{y}b_{z}-a_{z}b_{y})}^{2}+{(a_{z}b_{x}-a_{x}b_{z})}^{2}+{(a_{x}b_{y}-a_{y}b_{x})}^{2}}
$$
Let the areas of these projections be A,B,C respectively.What now needs to be proven is:
$$
|c|^2=A^2+B^2+C^2
$$
But I will be showing this for a general case instead, that is for any closed curve in 3D-space which lies on a single plane and has area $T$;
$$
T^2=(T_{xy})^2+(T_{yz})^2+(T_{zx})^2
$$
Where $(T_{xy}),(T_{yz}),(T_{zx})$ are its projection upon respective coordinate planes.
Now,generally when we calculate the determinant given in the question, which is: $$ \begin{vmatrix} i & j & k \\ a_{x}&a_{y}&a_{z} \\ b_{x}&b_{y} &b_{z} \\ \end{vmatrix} $$ we derive a new vector $c$: $$ c=(a_{y}b_{z}-a_{z}b_{y})\hat{i}+(a_{z}b_{x}-a_{x}b_{z})\hat{j}+(a_{x}b_{y}-a_{y}b_{x})\hat{k} $$ Upon inspecting the components of the newly found vector one can see that the coefficients of the unit vectors $\hat{i},\hat{j},\hat{k}$ are nothing but the area of projections of the parallelogram formed by the vectors $a$ and $b$ upon the $y-z, z-x, x-y$ planes, respectively.
First, lets consider two planes $P_{1},P_{2}$ inclined at some angle $\theta$ with each other. Consider an area element $S$ on $P_{1}$, then its projection upon the other plane will have an area of $S(cos(\theta))$. This can be understood by same approach we apply for calculating area under curves during integration. We use infinitesimally thin strips parallel to each other under the curve. If we take similar strips in plane $P_{1}$ which are perpendicular to the line of intersection of $P_{1}, P_{2}$ then their projection on the $P_{2}$ will be of length $cos(\theta)$ times the original length. Therefore any area element($=S$) calculated for any curve in $P_{1}$ will have its projection on $P_{2}$ of area $=S(cos(\theta))$.
And hence the angles it subtends with coordinate axes $X,Y,Z$ will be $\beta,\gamma,\alpha$ and hence the unit vector $u$ will have $cos(\beta), cos(\gamma),cos(\alpha)$ along them.Here, just to be clear, $\beta,\gamma,\alpha$ are angles of $u$ with axes$X,Y,Z$ and the angles of $u$ with coordinate planes $y-z,z-x,x-y$, respectively. Remember that
$$
c=(a_{y}b_{z}-a_{z}b_{y})\hat{i}+(a_{z}b_{x}-a_{x}b_{z})\hat{j}+(a_{x}b_{y}-a_{y}b_{x})\hat{k}
$$
has coefficients as area of projection of parallelogram formed by $a,b$ on $y-z,z-x,x-y$ for unit vectors $\hat{i}, \hat{j}, \hat{k}$ respectively. And we have already established that projected areas are $cos(\theta)$ times the original area, $\theta$ being the
angle between the two planes.
This holds true irrespective of the orientation of the closed curve with in the plane $P_{1}$. For example for a triangle in $P_{1}$ with area $t$, its projection will have area $t(cos(\theta))$. One can rotate or flip the triangle within $P_{1}$ and can even deform it to make another shape(but with same area) but its projection's area in $P_{2}$ will remain constant as long as the area of the closed curve in $P_{1}$ and the $\angle \theta$ remains constant.
Second,now employing the De Gua's theorem for a tri-rectangular tetrahedron:
Let the right angled sides have area $e,f,g$ and the hypotenuse side have area $h$,then it follows $e^2+f^2+g^2=h^2$
Notice that $e,f,g$ can be considered as projected areas of hypotenuse triangle with area $h$ on coordinate planes. Let them be the projections with $xy,yz,zx$ coordinate planes respectively. And from previous observations we can also conclude that : $$ \frac{e}{h}=cos(\alpha) $$ $$ \frac{f}{h}=cos(\beta) $$ $$ \frac{g}{h}=cos(\gamma) $$ where $\alpha,\beta,\gamma$ are the angles made by the hypotenuse face with the respective coordinate planes. Remember that we have already established that no matter how we deform the original closed curve, as long as its area is constant and the containing plane retains its orientation in the 3D space( that is its angles with the coordinate planes($\alpha,\beta,\gamma$) remains same). The area of projection will also remain constant.
What that means is that we can translate the hypotenuse triangle in 3D space and deform it in anyway without opening the curve (and keeping area($h$) constant) then e,f,h shall also remain constant. Hence, on generalizing, it follows that for any area element($T$) in 3D space and contained in single plane: $$ T=(T_{xy})^2+(T_{yz})^2+(T_{zx})^2 $$ Where $(T_{xy})^2,(T_{yz})^2,(T_{zx})^2$ are its projection upon respective coordinate planes.
And thus we conclude that $A^2+B^2+C^2$ and $|c|$ indeed equals to the area of the parallelogram formed by vectors $a,b$.
And $\therefore$ $|c|=|a||b|(sin(\phi)$, where $\phi$ is the angle between the vectors $a,b$.
Coming to the perpendicularity of the vector $c$ to the plane containing vectors $a,b$. To understand this, imagine a unit vector $u$ perpendicular to the plane containing $a$ and $b$, let this plane be $P_{ab}$. Let the angles made by the plane $P_{ab}$ and coordinate planes $x-y,y-z,z-x$ once again be $\alpha,\beta,\gamma$ . Since $u$ is perpendicular to $P_{ab}$ the angles it makes with the coordinate planes $x-y,y-z,z-x$ will be $\frac{\pi}{2}-\alpha,\frac{\pi}{2}-\beta,\frac{\pi}{2}-\gamma$
Therefore vector $c$ also has unit vector same as vector $u$, i.e. $cos(\beta),cos(\alpha),cos(\gamma)$. Therefore vector $c$ is perpendicular to $P_{ab}$.