Why do Ad(K) orbits in the $-1$ eigenspace of a Cartan decomposition intersect the Weyl chamber once?

393 Views Asked by At

Let $G$ be a semisimple Lie group and let $\frak p\oplus k$ be a Cartan decomposition of $\frak g$ and $K$ the connected subgroup with Lie algebra $\frak k$. Choose a maximal abelian subalgebra $\frak a \subset p$, an ordering of $\frak a^\ast$, and let $\Sigma^+$ be the positive roots of $\frak a$ with respect to $\frak g$. Denote by $\frak a^+$ the positive Weyl chamber, $$\mathfrak{a}^+=\{ H \in \mathfrak{a} : \lambda (H)>0 \hspace{3mm} \lambda \in \Sigma^+ \}$$

I read that every $Ad(K)$ orbit in $\frak p$ intersects $\frak \overline{a^+}$ exactly once. Why is this?

Edit: I'm aware that $$\bigcup_{k\in K} Ad(k)\frak a= p$$ so all I need to know is why any $H\in \frak a$ has a unique conjugate in $\overline{\frak a^+}$.

2

There are 2 best solutions below

0
On

Your root system on $\mathfrak{a}^*$ is induced by an inner product (Killing form, say) on $\mathfrak{a}$. So we might as well think of a root system as being in $\mathfrak{a}$. By Knapp $6.57$, the action of the Weyl group here (by reflections) is realised exactly by the $\operatorname{Ad}$ action of $$N_K(\mathfrak{a})/Z_K(\mathfrak{a}). $$ General root system theory says any $H\in \mathfrak{a}$ can be sent to a unique element in the closed Weyl chamber by the above action (see for example Bump Theorem $20.1$ (iii)).

What I don't know is why two elements $H_1, H_2$ in the closed Weyl Chamber can't be conjugate by some $k \in K \smallsetminus N_K(\mathfrak{a})$.

2
On

For uniqueness, the main technical result is given in Eberlein as 2.20.18. There is actually a typo- the word "maximal" is missing from the phrase "maximal abelian subspaces" in the last sentence of the statement.

This proof replaces $\mathfrak{g}=\mathfrak{k}+\mathfrak{p}$ with $\mathfrak{g}^\ast=\mathfrak{k}+i\mathfrak{p}$, a compact real form of the complexification of $\mathfrak{g}$. The proof takes advantage of the fact that a compact connected Lie group has surjective exponential map.

It's not a complete surprise that uniqueness should be delicate. The full isometry group may contain isometries acting nontrivially on a given Weyl chamber.