Why do we define the complex exponential as we do? Defining $e^{z}$ as $e^{x}e^{iy}$ certainly seems to make sense, but I'm not sure the formal reason as to why it's defined like this. Was it from looking at Taylor Series, or was it just because we want the nice multiplicative structure? We can show that the real exponential function splits over addition, but the complex one has an addition that is different, so is it simply defined as I stated above, or is there an obvious thing I'm missing?
2026-03-29 05:11:01.1774761061
Why do we define the complex exponential as we do?
1.2k Views Asked by user82004 https://math.techqa.club/user/user82004/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in COMPLEX-ANALYSIS
- Minkowski functional of balanced domain with smooth boundary
- limit points at infinity
- conformal mapping and rational function
- orientation of circle in complex plane
- If $u+v = \frac{2 \sin 2x}{e^{2y}+e^{-2y}-2 \cos 2x}$ then find corresponding analytical function $f(z)=u+iv$
- Is there a trigonometric identity that implies the Riemann Hypothesis?
- order of zero of modular form from it's expansion at infinity
- How to get to $\frac{1}{2\pi i} \oint_C \frac{f'(z)}{f(z)} \, dz =n_0-n_p$ from Cauchy's residue theorem?
- If $g(z)$ is analytic function, and $g(z)=O(|z|)$ and g(z) is never zero then show that g(z) is constant.
- Radius of convergence of Taylor series of a function of real variable
Related Questions in EXPONENTIATION
- exponential equation with different bases; no logarithms
- Is square root of $y^2$ for every $y>0,y\in\mathbb{R}$?
- Definite sum for $(1+a)^n$
- Fractional exponents definition and the additive law of exponents
- Fourth term in the expansion of $(1-2x)^{3/2}$
- Why is $\int_{0}^{t} e^{nt} \mathrm{\ dt} = \frac{1}{n} \left(e^{nt} - 1\right)$? [solved; notation is also faulty in the first place]
- Exponentiation property of the modulo operator
- When are $\left(\frac{a}{b}\right)^c$ and $\frac{a^c}{b^c}$ equivalent?
- How can I rewrite expression to get log out of exponent
- Compare $2^{2016}$ and $10^{605}$ without a calculator
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
The short answer is: we don't always.
Many places will define the complex exponential by the power series:
$$\exp(z)=\sum_{n=0}^\infty {z^n\over n!}$$
and justify that by analyticity, this always matches the value on the real axis.
From here one can verify that it satisfies the functional equation
$$\exp(z+w)=\exp z\exp w$$
directly by treating $w$ as fixed, but arbitrary and performing the analysis on the variable $z$.
Certainly the definition you mention makes some sense, as wanting the complex exponential to behave the same way as the real one by demanding the functional equation hold can give rise to the equations
$${\partial\over \partial x}(e^xe^{iy})=e^xe^{iy},\; {\partial\over\partial y}e^xe^{iy}=ie^xe^{iy}$$
From there we use that
$${d\over dz}={1\over 2}\left({\partial\over\partial x}-i{\partial\over\partial y}\right)$$
With the given definition, we get:
$${d\over dz}e^z={1\over 2}\left(e^xe^{iy}-i\left(ie^xe^{iy}\right)\right)=e^xe^{iy}=e^z$$
so that the complex exponential satisfies the appropriate differential equation, one of it's best properties from real variables, so it supports the choice made there.