Why does an automorphism of the disk that is an involution not have fixed points in its boundary?

801 Views Asked by At

I'm reading Milnor's Dynamical Systems in One Complex Variable and I'm stuck with a detail in one of his proofs and would appreciate some help!

Let $F$ be an automorphism of $\overline{\mathbb{D}}$ such that $F$ is an involution with two fixed points. We have that $F'(z) = -1$ for the two fixed points. Thus, if $F$ maps $\mathbb{D}$ onto itself, neither of these fixed points can be on the boundary circle.

This is what the book says. I don't quite follow why neither of the fixed points can be on the boundary circle. I know that any automorphism of the closed disk is of the form $e^{i\theta} \frac{z-a}{1-\bar{a}z}$. So, $F'(z) = \frac{ad-bc}{(cz+d)^2} = \frac{e^{i\theta}(1+a\bar{a})}{(1-\bar{a}z)^2}=-1$. Since $z$ is a fixed point, $e^{i\theta} \frac{z-a}{1-\bar{a}z}=z$. I divide the two equations to get that $-z = \frac{(z-a)(1-\bar{a}z)}{1+a\bar{a}}$. Suppose that $|z|=1$ so that $z$ is in the boundary circle. We have $1 = |\frac{(z-a)(1-\bar{a}z)}{1+a\bar{a}}|= \frac{|\bar{z}||z-a||1-\bar{a}z|}{|1+a\bar{a}|} = \frac{|1-\bar{z}a||1-\bar{a}z|}{|1+a\bar{a}|} = \frac{|1-\bar{z}a|^2}{|1+a\bar{a}|}$ so that $|1-\bar{z}a|^2 =1+a\bar{a}$. I tried using reverse triangle inequality, but it failed.

1

There are 1 best solutions below

0
On

If $z_0\in\partial \mathbb{D}$ is a fixed point of an automorphism $f$ of $\mathbb{D}$, then $f'(z_0) > 0$.

For an automorphism of the unit disk is a Möbius transformation, hence an automorphism of the entire Riemann sphere, and it maps the unit circle to itself.

So $f'(z_0)$ must map the tangent to the unit circle in $z_0$ to itself, hence $f'(z_0) \in\mathbb{R}$. If we had $f'(z_0) < 0$, $f$ would map points $(1-\varepsilon)z_0$ outside the unit circle, contradicting the assumption that it be an automorphism of the unit disk.