I saw this in this lecture : Asymptotic Notation at the 15 minute mark. But I don't understand it. And also why does $f_{2}(n) = 2n^3 + 3n + 79 \in\theta(n^3)$? I don't understand the proof.
2026-04-13 10:43:06.1776076986
Why does $f_{1}(n) = 10n^3 + 5n^2 + 17 \in \theta(n^3)$?
687 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in ASYMPTOTICS
- Justify an approximation of $\sum_{n=1}^\infty G_n/\binom{\frac{n}{2}+\frac{1}{2}}{\frac{n}{2}}$, where $G_n$ denotes the Gregory coefficients
- How to find the asymptotic behaviour of $(y'')^2=y'+y$ as $x$ tends to $\infty$?
- Correct way to prove Big O statement
- Proving big theta notation?
- Asymptotics for partial sum of product of binomial coefficients
- Little oh notation
- Recurrence Relation for Towers of Hanoi
- proving sigma = BigTheta (BigΘ)
- What's wrong with the boundary condition of this $1$st order ODE?
- Every linearly-ordered real-parametrized family of asymptotic classes is nowhere dense?
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Until you specify what exactly you don't understand from the video's explanation, I will recap the definitions here.
Informally, we can think of it as though the functions $f$ and $g$ both "grow at the same speed" relatively speaking. A function like $n^2$ grows much faster than a function like $n$, but they are both dwarfed by a function like $n^3$. On the other hand, a function like $2^n$ grows much faster than the others so far, but that is childs play compared to $3^n$ which is itself nothing compared to $3^{(3^n)}$ which is itself nothing compared to $\underbrace{n^{n^{.^{.^{.^{n}}}}}}_{n~\text{times}}$. Even bigger and bigger functions can be made. So, when two "act pretty much the same" we like to know it and label it as such.
In the examples, we wish to show that $\color{purple}{10n^3+5n^2+17} = \Theta(\color{green}{n^3})$. That is to say, we want to know if there is some point at which $\color{green}{n^3}$ times some positive constant $\color{red}{k_1}$ will always be smaller than $\color{purple}{10n^3+5n^2+17}$, and we also want to know if there is some point at which $\color{green}{n^3}$ times some positive constant $\color{blue}{k_2}$ will always be bigger than $\color{purple}{10n^3+5n^2+17}$.
We see that for all positive $n$ (i.e. for all $n\geq 1$) one has:
$$\color{red}{1}\cdot \color{green}{n^3}\leq 10n^3\leq \color{purple}{10n^3+5n^2+17}\leq 10n^3+5n^3+17n^3\leq \color{blue}{32}\cdot\color{green}{n^3}$$
Indeed, the inequality holds (it doesn't even require induction to prove). Letting $k_1=1, k_2=32,$ and $N=1$, this shows that $10n^3+5n^2+17$ satisfies the definition given above for $10n^3+5n^2+17=\Theta(n^3)$.
Very informally, this should be immediately apparent as the "biggest part" of $10n^3+5n^2+17$ is a constant multiple of $n^3$. In general, if you have several things being added, you can ignore all of them except the "fastest growing piece" and compare that way. For example, I know without having to check formally that $34n^7+10n^2-5+\frac{1}{n}$ is in fact asymptotically bounded above and below by $n^7$. Similarly I know that $34n^7+10n^2-5+\frac{1}{n}$ is not asymptotically bounded above and below by $n^2$ (since the $34n^7$ piece grows much faster than $n^2$ ever could).