Everywhere is definition of total differential I see the sum of partial derivatives multiplied by appropriate differentials, but there is nowhere clear explanation why it is.
2026-04-12 09:31:58.1775986318
Why does total differential is sum of partial derivatives?
6.7k Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in ORDINARY-DIFFERENTIAL-EQUATIONS
- The Runge-Kutta method for a system of equations
- Analytical solution of a nonlinear ordinary differential equation
- Stability of system of ordinary nonlinear differential equations
- Maximal interval of existence of the IVP
- Power series solution of $y''+e^xy' - y=0$
- Change of variables in a differential equation
- Dimension of solution space of homogeneous differential equation, proof
- Solve the initial value problem $x^2y'+y(x-y)=0$
- Stability of system of parameters $\kappa, \lambda$ when there is a zero eigenvalue
- Derive an equation with Faraday's law
Related Questions in DERIVATIVES
- Derivative of $ \sqrt x + sinx $
- Second directional derivative of a scaler in polar coordinate
- A problem on mathematical analysis.
- Why the derivative of $T(\gamma(s))$ is $T$ if this composition is not a linear transformation?
- Does there exist any relationship between non-constant $N$-Exhaustible function and differentiability?
- Holding intermediate variables constant in partial derivative chain rule
- How would I simplify this fraction easily?
- Why is the derivative of a vector in polar form the cross product?
- Proving smoothness for a sequence of functions.
- Gradient and Hessian of quadratic form
Related Questions in PARTIAL-DERIVATIVE
- Equality of Mixed Partial Derivatives - Simple proof is Confusing
- Proving the differentiability of the following function of two variables
- Partial Derivative vs Total Derivative: Function depending Implicitly and Explicitly on Variable
- Holding intermediate variables constant in partial derivative chain rule
- Derive an equation with Faraday's law
- How might we express a second order PDE as a system of first order PDE's?
- Partial derivative of a summation
- How might I find, in parametric form, the solution to this (first order, quasilinear) PDE?
- Solving a PDE given initial/boundary conditions.
- Proof for f must be a constant polynomial
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
The differential of a function $f:\mathbb R^m\to\mathbb R^n$ is a linear map that is the “best” approximation to the change of $f$ near some point $\mathbf p=(p^1,\dots,p^n)$, i.e., $f(\mathbf p+\mathbf h)=f(\mathbf p)+\operatorname{d}f_{\mathbf p}[\mathbf h]+o(\|\mathbf h\|)$. Restricting ourselves to a scalar-valued function $f:\mathbb R^n\to\mathbb R$, it’s fairly straightforward to show that ${\partial f\over\partial x_k}(\mathbf p)=\operatorname{d}f_{\mathbf p}[\mathbf e^k]$, where $\mathbf e^k$ is the basis vector corresponding to the $x^k$ coordinate. Since a linear map is determined by its action on the basis vectors, in this coordinate system we can write $\operatorname{d}f_{\mathbf v}$ as the row vector $\left({\partial f\over\partial x_1}(\mathbf p),\dots,{\partial f\over\partial x_n}(\mathbf p)\right)$ so that $\operatorname{d}f_{\mathbf p}[\mathbf h]$ becomes simple matrix multiplication (or, if you prefer, a dot product).
Now, the differential $dx^i$ of the affine coordinate function $x^i$ is just a function that assigns to a point $\mathbf p$ its $i$th coordinate. Using the above matrix formulation, this means that $dx^1=(1,0,\dots,0)$, $dx^2=(0,1,0,\dots,0)$, and so on. So we can write $\operatorname{d}f_{\mathbf p}$ as $${\partial f\over\partial x_1}(\mathbf p)(1,0,\dots,0)+\cdots+{\partial f\over\partial x_n}(\mathbf p)(0,0,\dots,1)$$ or $${\partial f\over\partial x_1}dx^1+\cdots+{\partial f\over\partial x_n}dx^n$$ (with the partial derivatives evaluated at $\mathbf p$).
It might help to look at this geometrically. For a scalar-valued function $f$, this linear approximation amounts to approximating the $n$-dimensional hypersurface (in $\mathbb R^{n+1}$) $y=f(\mathbf x)$ at the point $\mathbf p$ by its tangent hypersurface at that point. Just as the derivative of $f$ gives the slope of the tangent line to the curve $y=f(x)$ in the one-dimensional case $f:\mathbb R\to\mathbb R$, in the multidimensional case each partial derivative ${\partial f\over\partial x_i}$ gives the slope of the tangent hypersurface in the $x^i$ direction. The equation of the tangent hypersurface at $\mathbf p$ is thus $$y={\partial f\over\partial x_1}(x^1-p^1)+\cdots+{\partial f\over\partial x_n}(x^n-p^n)=\left({\partial f\over\partial x_1},\cdots,{\partial f\over\partial x_n}\right)(\mathbf x-\mathbf p),$$ with the partial derivatives evaluated at $\mathbf p$. Comparing this to the definition of $\operatorname{d}f_{\mathbf p}$ at the top, we again find that it can be represented as a row vector of partial derivatives, and proceed as before.