We know that in matrices AB=BA.Why in this Matrices $A=\begin{bmatrix} -1 & 3\\ 2 & 0\end{bmatrix}$, $B=\begin{bmatrix} 1 & 2\\ -3 & -5\end{bmatrix}$ are not equal to $AB=BA$. WHY? This is matrix of order $2\times 2$ for both $A$ and $B$.
Why in these matrices are $AB=BA$ not equal? What is the logic behind them?
21.3k Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail AtThere are 4 best solutions below
On
Matrix multiplication is generally not commutative unless they're both equal or they're inverses (in which case you will obtain the identity).
On
You can think of matrices as linear transformations. For example, let $T$ be the map which rotates a point ninety degrees counterclockwise. It is the function from the plane $\mathbb{R}^2$ to itself given by the formula $(x,y) \mapsto (-y,x)$. It is represented by the matrix $$A =\begin{pmatrix} 0 & -1 \\ 1 & 0 \end{pmatrix}$$
in the sense that if you want to compute what $T$ does to a point $v = (x,y)$, just compute the matrix product $Av^{\textrm{tr}}$, where here $v^{\textrm{tr}}$ means $\begin{pmatrix} x \\ y \end{pmatrix}$.
On the other hand, consider the function $S$ which takes a point $(x,y)$ and reflects it across the $x$-axis, giving you the point $(x,-y)$. It is represented by the matrix $$B = \begin{pmatrix} 1 & 0 \\ 0 & -1 \end{pmatrix}$$ Under the interpretation of matrices as functions from the plane to itself, the composition $T \circ S$ (that is, $S$ followed by $T$) corresponds to the matrix product $AB$, and $S \circ T$ corresponds to the matrix product $BA$.
But it is intuitively obvious that $T \circ S$ and $S \circ T$ are not the same function: rotating a point ninety degrees counterclockwise, and then reflecting it across the $x$-axis, usually does not do the same thing as first reflecting the point across the $x$-axis, and then rotating it ninety degrees. Since $T \circ S \neq S \circ T$, we cannot expect to have $AB = BA$, and you can indeed check that these matrices are not equal.
On
Consider what matrices "do".
For example: the matrix $$ A := \begin{pmatrix} 2 & 0 \\ 0 & 1 \end{pmatrix} $$ stretches the $x$-axis by a factor of two, and the matrix $$ B := \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} \begin{pmatrix} 0 & -1 \\ 1 & 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ rotates everything $90^\circ$ anti-clockwise.
Thus $$ B A \begin{pmatrix} 1 \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ first stretches the $x$ component of the vector $(1, 0)^T$ then rotates, whereas $$ A B \begin{pmatrix} 1 \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ first rotates and then stretches the $x$ component.
You can convince yourself that the resulting point is not the same in the two cases. This means that $B A \neq A B$.
It simply isn't true that $AB = BA$, except in very special cases, such as if both $A$ and $B$ are diagonal.
For instance, for general $2\times 2$ matrices $A = \left[\begin{smallmatrix}a&b\\c&d\end{smallmatrix}\right]$ and $B = \left[\begin{smallmatrix}r&s\\t&u\end{smallmatrix}\right]$ we have $$ AB = \begin{bmatrix}ar + bt & as + bu\\cr + dt & cs + du\end{bmatrix} $$ while $$ BA = \begin{bmatrix}ar + cs & br + ds\\at + cu & bt + du\end{bmatrix} $$ and you can clearly see that there are loads of choices for $a, b, c, d, r, s, t, u$ that makes these two matrices different.