I am new to number theory. I read in cryptography inverse modulo exponentiation is used because it is hard. But I couldn't understand the advantage of it over inverse exponentiation without modulo. Could someone please explain the advanatge
2026-04-12 15:59:05.1776009545
Why inverse modulo exponentiation is harder than inverse exponentiation without modulo
1.1k Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in NUMBER-THEORY
- Maximum number of guaranteed coins to get in a "30 coins in 3 boxes" puzzle
- Interesting number theoretical game
- Show that $(x,y,z)$ is a primitive Pythagorean triple then either $x$ or $y$ is divisible by $3$.
- About polynomial value being perfect power.
- Name of Theorem for Coloring of $\{1, \dots, n\}$
- Reciprocal-totient function, in term of the totient function?
- What is the smallest integer $N>2$, such that $x^5+y^5 = N$ has a rational solution?
- Integer from base 10 to base 2
- How do I show that any natural number of this expression is a natural linear combination?
- Counting the number of solutions of the congruence $x^k\equiv h$ (mod q)
Related Questions in ELEMENTARY-NUMBER-THEORY
- Maximum number of guaranteed coins to get in a "30 coins in 3 boxes" puzzle
- Interesting number theoretical game
- How do I show that if $\boldsymbol{a_1 a_2 a_3\cdots a_n \mid k}$ then each variable divides $\boldsymbol k $?
- Using only the digits 2,3,9, how many six-digit numbers can be formed which are divisible by 6?
- Algebra Proof including relative primes.
- How do I show that any natural number of this expression is a natural linear combination?
- Counting the number of solutions of the congruence $x^k\equiv h$ (mod q)
- algebraic integers of $x^4 -10x^2 +1$
- What exactly is the definition of Carmichael numbers?
- Number of divisors 888,888.
Related Questions in MODULAR-ARITHMETIC
- How do I find the least x that satisfies this congruence properties?
- Counting the number of solutions of the congruence $x^k\equiv h$ (mod q)
- Remainder of $22!$ upon division with $23$?
- Does increasing the modulo decrease collisions?
- Congruence equation ...
- Reducing products in modular arithmetic
- Product of sums of all subsets mod $k$?
- Lack of clarity over modular arithmetic notation
- How to prove infinitely many integer triples $x,y,z$ such that $x^2 + y^2 + z^2$ is divisible by $(x + y +z)$
- Can $\mathbb{Z}_2$ be constructed as the closure of $4\mathbb{Z}+1$?
Related Questions in EXPONENTIATION
- exponential equation with different bases; no logarithms
- Is square root of $y^2$ for every $y>0,y\in\mathbb{R}$?
- Definite sum for $(1+a)^n$
- Fractional exponents definition and the additive law of exponents
- Fourth term in the expansion of $(1-2x)^{3/2}$
- Why is $\int_{0}^{t} e^{nt} \mathrm{\ dt} = \frac{1}{n} \left(e^{nt} - 1\right)$? [solved; notation is also faulty in the first place]
- Exponentiation property of the modulo operator
- When are $\left(\frac{a}{b}\right)^c$ and $\frac{a^c}{b^c}$ equivalent?
- How can I rewrite expression to get log out of exponent
- Compare $2^{2016}$ and $10^{605}$ without a calculator
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Here's an example that might make things more clear. Suppose you want to solve $3^x=80$. You know that $3^4=81$, so the answer is a little less than 4. Using inverse exponentiation (logs) on the reals, we can find the exact answer as $3.988769\ldots$. Because the function is continuous, we can do all sorts of nice approximations like the bisection method or Taylor series to home in on the answer quickly.
Now let's try to solve $3^x\equiv 80\pmod{17}$. As it happens, $80\equiv 12\pmod{17}$, so we want to solve $3^x\equiv 12\pmod{17}$. Since we have only integers at our disposal, there's no really efficient way to figure out that the only answer is $x=13$. Knowing that $81$ is close to $80$ doesn't help at all; $4$ isn't close to $13$.
I found $13$ by trial and error. If $17$ were a much larger number, trial and error would take too long.