I have started topology from Munkres. Here in section $14$, I am stuck up in a definition. It says,
Let $X$ be a set with a simple order relation; assume $X$ has more than one element. Let B be the collection of all sets of following types:
- All open intervals $(a, b)$ in $X$.
- All intervals of form $[a, b)$ of $X$
- All intervals of form $(a, b]$ of $X$.
The collection B is a basis for order topology on $X$.
But here we have omitted $[a, b]$. Why?
I have read about standard topology, lower limit topology, upper limit topology. But set of all closed interval don't generate topology. My intuition says that these two are somehow linked.
Read Munkres carefully. He writes:
It does not say intervals of the form $[a,b)$ and $(a,b]$ for any $a,b$, but only when the endpoints are the extrema of the order relation.
For example, take $[0,1]$ with the subspace topology in $\mathbb{R}$ with the standard topology. Then open sets which form a basis are of the form $(a,b), 0<a<b<1$, $[0,a)$ and $(b,1]$. This is what he means.
The order topology is meant to mimic our understanding of the order topology on $\mathbb{R}$. We want sets to be open which are unions of "open intervals", i.e. not containing their endpoints.
If you want the question as initially stated, then in fact every subset is open, so this is the discrete topology. To see this, if $[a,M)$ and $(-M,a]$ are in the basis for each $a, |a|<M$, then $\{a\}=[a,M)\cap (-M,a]$ is an open set for any $a$.
An interesting note, though this is a bit more advanced, is that you CAN include one of those half open intervals, either $[a,b)$ or $(a,b]$, and get a topology which is not trivial or the standard order topology. When we take $\mathbb{R}$ and include sets of the form $[a,b)$ in the basis we get the so called lower limit topology. This has many interesting properties: it is non-metrizable, it doesn't have a countable basis, and is totally disconnected, all properties we normally associate with $\mathbb{R}$ with the order topology.