Let $G$ be a locally compact group with Haar measure $\lambda$. The locally compact group $G\times G$ then carries the Haar measure $\lambda\times \lambda$. One can then define the map $$\Delta: L^\infty(G)\to L^\infty(G\times G, \lambda\times \lambda)$$ by $$\Delta(f)(s,t) = f(st).$$ Why is this well-defined? I.e. if $f= 0$ almost everywhere, why is $\Delta(f)= 0$ almost everywhere? This seems to be well-known, but not so obvious to me: Why is $$\{(s,t): f(st)\ne 0\}$$ a null-set, if $\{f\ne 0\}$ is a null-set?
2026-03-26 19:10:52.1774552252
Why is $\Delta(f)(s,t)= f(st)$ well-defined?
40 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in MEASURE-THEORY
- On sufficient condition for pre-compactness "in measure"(i.e. in Young measure space)
- Absolutely continuous functions are dense in $L^1$
- I can't undestand why $ \{x \in X : f(x) > g(x) \} = \bigcup_{r \in \mathbb{Q}}{\{x\in X : f(x) > r\}\cap\{x\in X:g(x) < r\}} $
- Trace $\sigma$-algebra of a product $\sigma$-algebra is product $\sigma$-algebra of the trace $\sigma$-algebras
- Meaning of a double integral
- Random variables coincide
- Convergence in measure preserves measurability
- Convergence in distribution of a discretized random variable and generated sigma-algebras
- A sequence of absolutely continuous functions whose derivatives converge to $0$ a.e
- $f\in L_{p_1}\cap L_{p_2}$ implies $f\in L_{p}$ for all $p\in (p_1,p_2)$
Related Questions in TOPOLOGICAL-GROUPS
- Are compact groups acting on Polish spaces essentially Polish?
- Homotopy group of rank 2 of various manifolds
- A question on Group of homeomorphism of $[0,1]$.
- $G\cong G/H\times H$ measurably
- Is a connected component a group?
- How to realize the character group as a Lie/algebraic/topological group?
- Show $\widehat{\mathbb{Z}}$ is isomorphic to $S^1$
- a question on Ellis semigroup
- Pontryagin dual group inherits local compactness
- Property of the additive group of reals
Related Questions in HAAR-MEASURE
- Comparing measures in finite dimensional complex vector spaces
- Convolution of a function and a measure.
- Relationship between the induced measure on an orbit and Hausdorff measure on the orbit
- When does $0=\int f(x)\psi(x)\,dx$ for all $f\in L^1(G)$ imply that $\psi=0$
- Inverse map preserving positivity with Haar measure?
- Finite measure fundamental domain for a discrete group implies it's a lattice
- Does Haar measure have such property?
- Haar measure of $p$-adic integers with valuation 0 modulo 3
- Sufficient condition for Radon measure be Haar measure
- Orthogonal group representation induces an isometry on $L^p$ spaces
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Denote $\cdot : G\times G \to G$ to be the group operation. We will think about it as function from product to $G$ most of the times. For $f \in L^\infty(G, \lambda)$, the function $\Delta f$ is composition $f \circ \cdot$. You are essentially asking why $$\lambda(f^{-1}(\mathbb{R} \setminus \{0\})) = 0\quad\implies\quad \lambda \times \lambda ((f \circ \cdot)^{-1} (\mathbb{R} \setminus \{0\})) = 0.$$
This can be proven using the defining property of product measure, and invariance of Haar measure with respect to $\cdot$. Product measure is one satisfying $$ \lambda \times \lambda(A) = \int_G \lambda(A^g) \lambda(dg),$$ where $A \subseteq G\times G$ and $A^g = \{h \in G: (g, h) \in A\}$. With that, we can write for any $\lambda$-null set $Z \subseteq G$ that $$ \lambda \times \lambda(\cdot^{-1} Z) = \int_G \lambda((\cdot^{-1} Z)^g) \lambda(dg) = \int_G \lambda(g^{-1}Z)) \lambda(dg), $$ because $(\cdot^{-1} Z)^g = \{h: g \cdot h \in Z\}$. Now using invariance, function under the integral is always $\lambda(Z) = 0$, and therefore integral is zero as well.
The result now follows by taking $Z = \{g: f(g) \neq 0\}$, because $\cdot^{-1} Z$ is then precisely $\{(g, h): f(gh) \neq 0\}$.