why is lower triangular matrix not mentioned in the Jordan normal form definition?

495 Views Asked by At

In Wikipedia It is written that

Jordan canonical form is an upper triangualr matrix of a particular form called a Jordan matrix representing a linear operator on a finite dimensional vector space with respect to some basis enter image description here


My confusion :why is lower triangular matrix not mentioned in the Jordan normal form definition ?


My thinking : I can also construct lower triangular matrix in the same pattern

see the diagram below

enter image description here

1

There are 1 best solutions below

0
On BEST ANSWER

Every matrix is simlar to its transponse, so a lower triangular Jordan block would be similar to an upper triangular Jordan block. I recall reading a linear algebra book (I think Serge Lang's) where the Jordan form was lower triangular. It's all a matter of reversing the order of the cyclic (sub-)basis.