We know that every RE language is accepted by Turing machine. And emptiness, finiteness of every RE language is undecidable. My question is how I check decidability "the Turing machine makes move left or not" among the infinite strings. I have found internet contents but very difficult to understand. I want to understand just intuition which is brief, not the concrete proof.
2026-02-24 02:02:36.1771898556
Why is "Turing machine makes no left move" decidable?
1.4k Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in RECURSIVE-ALGORITHMS
- Designing an algorithm for integer multiplication
- Pre - calc problem turned hard, easier method for this formula?
- Simple recursive algorithms to manually compute elementary functions with pocket calculators
- Divide set into two subsets of equal sum and maximum this sum
- How many times can I do (n-1)/2 and get a whole number, recursive to formula
- Solving $A_{n+1}=3A_n+2^n$
- How to get QuickSort algorithm to run in any time between $n\log n$ and $n^2$
- Counting the number of binary heaps created with N elements with duplicite numbers
- Computation of compositions of ceilings and divisions
- How do I fight loss of significance and/or improve convergence for this recursive algorithm?
Related Questions in TURING-MACHINES
- Has the effort to confirm $\Sigma(5)$ and the search for new champions with $6$ states been stopped?
- Pop-up cards Turing complete?
- How does a cellular automaton "know" when to halt?
- Is the halting problem also undecideable for turing machines always writing a $1$ on the tape?
- Proof of "Extension" for Rice's Theorem
- Do we need enumeration to find the maximal number of steps a special Turing machine can make?
- Deciding wether a language is regular, in the arithmetic hierarchy
- Can a machine exist making more steps than the current record, which is no busy beaver?
- Can the halting problem for bounded Turing machines be efficiently decided?
- Can we efficiently determine the function $f(n,s)$?
Related Questions in DECIDABILITY
- Deciding wether a language is regular, in the arithmetic hierarchy
- SAT preserving conversion of statement to existential one
- The elementary theory of finite commutative rings
- Is the sign of a real number decidable?
- Relation between the monadic and two-variable fragment of first order logic
- Literature about decidable and undecidable theories
- Flaw in self-referential proof that all languages are undecidable
- A recursively enumerable theory without a decidable set of axioms.
- Proving decidability of $(\mathbb N, +)$ with Quantifier elimination and evaluating basic formulas
- Showing that Presburger arithmetic is decidable by deciding if $\mathbb N \models \varphi$, but does it give provability in the axioms?
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
(Note: To avoid complications, my Turing machines always have to move either to the left or to the right; they cannot remain in place. Not using this convention makes the proofs a bit more cumbersome, but doesnt change anything meaningful.)
Theorem: The problem "Given a TM $T$ and an input $w \in \Sigma^*$, will $T$ when run on $w$ ever move to the left on the tape?" is decidable.
Proof: A decision procedure starts as follows: We simulate what $T$ does on input $w$. If we ever see $T$ moving to the left, we answer "yes". If we see it halt instead, we answer "no". If neither of these happen, then $T$ will eventually have read all of $w$ and move on to the blank part of the tape to the right of $w$.
From then on, the tape has no impact on what $T$ does anymore (as there is always a blank there anyway). We keep simulating $T$ for as many further steps as $T$ has states. Again, if we see $T$ moving to the left, we can answer "yes". If we don't see $T$ moving to the left within these extra steps, $T$ will never do so - because $T$ has already completed the loop it will now follow forever. Thus, we can answer "no" at the end.
Theorem: The problem "Given a TM $T$, does there exist an input $w \in \Sigma^*$ such that $T$ ever moves left when run on $w$?" is decidable.
Proof: We inspect the control mechanism of $T$, and see whether there is any path from the starting state to transition involving a move to the left at all. If there is no such path, then obviously $T$ can never move to the left regardless of the input, and we answer "no". If there is such a path, we can answer "yes". To see this, consider a shortest such path. As $T$ would move left for the first time on the end of that path, every symbol it reads is a fresh symbol from the input word. Thus, by letting $w$ be whatever $T$ needs to read to go along this path, we can make $T$ move to the left.