Why is (y) a uniformizer for $y^2 = x^3 + x$ at (0,0) and why is its order equal to 1?

65 Views Asked by At

I'm currently trying to understand Silvermans example for the valuation on curves discussed in the answer to this post: Definition and example of "order of a function at a point of a curve"

Silverman has already shown that $M_P / M_P^2$ is generated by (y), but why does $M_P = (y)$ and then $ord_P(y) = 1$ follow from this fact?

This probably boils down to a deeper problem: Why are the elements if the function field with order one exactly the generators of $M_P$. I can see why $M_P = (t) \implies ord_P(t) = 1$ but I'm not really sure about the other implication. And how do the elements / generators of $M_P$ and $M_P^2$ relate to each other?

1

There are 1 best solutions below

5
On BEST ANSWER

If $(R, \mathfrak{m}, k)$ is a noetherian local ring and $M$ is a finite $R$-module, a special case of Nakayama's lemma states that if $\mathfrak{m}M = M$ then $M = 0$.

In particular if $[m_1], \dots, [m_n]$ is a $k$-basis for $M/\mathfrak{m}M$, we can choose representatives $m_1, \dots, m_n \in M$. Consider the submodule $N \subset M$ generated by these representatives. Then, $\mathfrak{m}(M/N) = M/N$, since $M = N + \mathfrak{m}M$, so by Nakayama's lemma $M = N$ and $M$ is generated by $m_1, \dots, m_n$.

Now, in your situation, $M_p/M_p^2$ is generated by $[y]$, so $y$ lifts to a generator of $M_p$, and since $M_p \neq M_p^2$, we must have $y \notin M_p^2$. Hence $\operatorname{ord}_p(y) = 1$. Similarly if $\operatorname{ord}_p(t) = 1$ for some rational function $t$ then $t \in M_p \setminus M_p^2$, so $[t] \neq 0$ in $M_p/M_p^2$. As long as $\dim_k M_p/M_p^2 = 1$ (ie. the curve is nonsingular at $p$) it follows that $t$ lifts to a uniformizing parameter.