Why there exist prime homogeneous ideals containing the Irrelevant ideal?

1.6k Views Asked by At

The notion of irrelevant ideal is something the doesn't bother me long time now, though the last day I came across it again and realised something that didn't now. That simply I don't understand how the whole $\textbf{Proj}$ construction works.

So my question is:

In Wiki article about $Proj$ sonstruction says: "Define the set $Proj(S)$ to be the set of all homogeneous prime ideals that do not contain the irrelevant ideal". Now since the irrelevant ideal is a maximal ideal (in the usual sense regardless of the grading part/structure), how is possible for a homogeneous prime ideal to contain the irrelevant ideal? Apparently I'm missing something, so can you please help me out and make more clear how does the $Proj$ construction works?

Thank you!

1

There are 1 best solutions below

6
On BEST ANSWER

First, let's fix some notation. Let $S=\bigoplus_{i=0}^\infty S_i$ be a graded ring with grading given by $S_i$ for $i\in\mathbb{Z}_{\geq0}$. Let $S_+=\bigoplus_{i=1}^{\infty} S_i$ be the irrelevant ideal of the ring $S$.

First, a caution: $S_+$ is not necessarily maximal. Consider $S=\mathbb{Z}[x_1,x_2,\cdots,x_n]$ with each $x_i$ of degree one. Then $S_+=(x_1,\cdots,x_n)$ and $S/S_+\cong \mathbb{Z}$ which is not a field, so $S_+$ is not maximal.

Secondly, it is certainly possible for a homogeneous prime ideal to contain $S_+$, the irrelevant ideal. Consider $S=\mathbb{Z}[x_1,\cdots,x_n]$ as before and let $\mathfrak{p}=(2,x_1,\cdots,x_n)\subset S$. Then $S/\mathfrak{p}=\mathbb{F}_2$, so $\mathfrak{p}$ is prime, homogeneous, and even maximal while properly containing $S_+$. Even further, if $S_0$ is a domain, $S_+$ is always prime and homogeneous (if $pq$ is positive degree, at least one of $p$ or $q$ must be of positive degree, and $S_+$ is trivially equal to $\bigoplus_{i=0}^\infty \left(S_+\cap S_i\right)$) so there is always at least one prime homogeneous ideal containing $S_+$, $S_+$ itself. (Interested readers may make the appropriate generalizations when $S_0$ is not a domain themselves.)

I think some of your confusion may stem from the definition of maximal ideal. A maximal ideal $\mathfrak{a}$ is an ideal which is maximal by inclusion among all proper ideals. This means if any proper ideal $\mathfrak{b}$ contains $\mathfrak{a}$, we must have $\mathfrak{b}=\mathfrak{a}$. This does not prohibit ideals containing maximal ideals, it just says that they must be equal.