In complex analysis, we include infinity to complex set to extend it. Why we need to do this? And do we do the same for real and why so? And how complex plane and real plane related to compactification ( I don't know about it !)?
2026-03-26 19:35:52.1774553752
Why we have extended complex plane?
373 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in REAL-ANALYSIS
- how is my proof on equinumerous sets
- Finding radius of convergence $\sum _{n=0}^{}(2+(-1)^n)^nz^n$
- Optimization - If the sum of objective functions are similar, will sum of argmax's be similar
- On sufficient condition for pre-compactness "in measure"(i.e. in Young measure space)
- Justify an approximation of $\sum_{n=1}^\infty G_n/\binom{\frac{n}{2}+\frac{1}{2}}{\frac{n}{2}}$, where $G_n$ denotes the Gregory coefficients
- Calculating the radius of convergence for $\sum _{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{\left(\sqrt{ n^2+n}-\sqrt{n^2+1}\right)^n}{n^2}z^n$
- Is this relating to continuous functions conjecture correct?
- What are the functions satisfying $f\left(2\sum_{i=0}^{\infty}\frac{a_i}{3^i}\right)=\sum_{i=0}^{\infty}\frac{a_i}{2^i}$
- Absolutely continuous functions are dense in $L^1$
- A particular exercise on convergence of recursive sequence
Related Questions in COMPLEX-ANALYSIS
- Minkowski functional of balanced domain with smooth boundary
- limit points at infinity
- conformal mapping and rational function
- orientation of circle in complex plane
- If $u+v = \frac{2 \sin 2x}{e^{2y}+e^{-2y}-2 \cos 2x}$ then find corresponding analytical function $f(z)=u+iv$
- Is there a trigonometric identity that implies the Riemann Hypothesis?
- order of zero of modular form from it's expansion at infinity
- How to get to $\frac{1}{2\pi i} \oint_C \frac{f'(z)}{f(z)} \, dz =n_0-n_p$ from Cauchy's residue theorem?
- If $g(z)$ is analytic function, and $g(z)=O(|z|)$ and g(z) is never zero then show that g(z) is constant.
- Radius of convergence of Taylor series of a function of real variable
Related Questions in COMPACTIFICATION
- Proving the one-point compactification of a topological space is a topology
- Topology generated by $\mathbb{R}$-valued functions of vanishing variation
- Proof of lemma 1 on "some questions in the theory of bicompactifications" by E. Sklyarenko
- Does every locally compact subset of $\mathbb {R}^n$ have a one-point compactification on $\mathbb{S}^{n}$?
- Proof of lemma 2 of "some questions in the theory of bicompactifications"
- Is there a way to describe these compactifications algebraically?
- Samuel compactification of the real line
- What are the open sets in Stone-Cech Compactification of $X$?
- Show that sequence is eventually constant in discrete space $X$.
- Is $[0,1]$ the Stone-Čech compactification of $(0,1)$?
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
This may be a broad question to answer to, depending on what you need to know, but I'll try to get the important points. Let us start with $\mathbb{R}$: when you study functions there you're often asked to calculate limits at infinity, i.e. to $+\infty$ and $-\infty$. This makes sense because you only have two directions to check.
Let us try to do the same thing in $\mathbb{C}$: you now have infinite directions to check and, moreover, limits may be different when going to infinity on a particular curve, so it makes no sense to ask of "different" infinities. Though, we may be interested on how a function behaves when it goes to infinity in some fashion. A way to ask this is to consider when the function is very far from the origin, i.e. calculate the limit for $\|z \| \to \infty$. (*)
What does this mean geometrically? It means we are considering the complementary sets of the neighborhoods of the origin, when calculating the limit. This sounds pretty awkward because we are used to reason with neighborhoods when dealing with limits and not with their complementary sets. This can be overcome by extending the plane: $\hat{\mathbb{C}} = \mathbb{C} \cup \{ \infty \}$ and giving a topology to this new space. I won't give the details on how this new topology is defined, but if you're interested you should look for Alexandrov compactification or one-point compactification. But the main thing about this topology is that the complementary of compact sets (of course you need to add them the $\infty$) are neighborhoods of $\infty$. So, this topology translates geometrically the condition (*).
Addendum: a nice geometrical feature of this new topology is that it makes $\hat{\mathbb{C}}$ homeomorphic to $S^2$ (called Riemann sphere), so it is now a compact space.
Remember that you may do the same thing in $\mathbb{R}$ and it becomes homeomorphic to $S^1$. Though, usually $\mathbb{R}$ is not extended in that way but with a two-point compactification (using $-\infty, +\infty$), because we want to keep an order on the line on not use it like a circle. The first case corresponds to considering different limits at $+\infty$ and $-\infty$, the second correspond to considering the global limit for $|x| \to \infty$.