I have been working through Rolfsen's "Knots and Links" and have found myself frustrated by exercise 4 on page 58. It concerns the Wirtinger Presentation of the figure eight knot, where the (unsimplified) knot group can be found with the four generators $x_1,\ldots,x_4$ and relations: $$ x_1 x_3 = x_3 x_2 $$ $$ x_4 x_2 = x_3 x_4 $$ $$ x_3 x_1 = x_1 x_4 $$ $$ x_2 x_4 = x_1 x_2. $$ The exercise says "Show combinatorially that the fourth relation is a consequence of the other three." Originally, I assumed this was just a simple algebraic manipulation, but after a while of no success, I am assuming that I am going about this the wrong way. If I just am missing the simple algebra solution, I would be satisfied and move on. Otherwise, what kind of "combinatorial" argue is intended here? I know that you are always suppose to be able to eliminate one of your relations, but cannot see how in this case. Thank you in advance for any response.
2026-03-28 20:57:32.1774731452
Wirtinger Presentation for the Figure eight knot, Rolfsen exercise
1.8k Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in KNOT-THEORY
- Is unknot a composite knot?
- Can we modify one component of a link and keep the others unchanged
- Can we split a splittable link by applying Reidemeister moves to non-self crossings only
- Involution of the 3 and 4-holed torus and its effects on some knots and links
- Equivalence polygonal knots with smooth knots
- Can a knot diagram be recovered from this data?
- Does Seifert's algorithm produce Seifert surfaces with minimal genus?
- Equivalence of links in $R^3$ or $S^3$
- Homotopy type of knot complements
- The complement of a knot is aspherical
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
We do algebraic manipulation on the first three equations to derive the fourth one. equation (1) is equivalent to the following $x_{1} = x_{3}x_{2}x_{3}^{-1}$.\ equation (2) is equivalent to $x_{4}x_{2}x_{4}^{-1} = x_{3}$\
Now put eqn(1) into eqn(3) to get: \begin{align*} & x_{4}x_{2}x_{2}x_{4}^{-1}x_{2}x_{4}x_{2}^{-1}x_{4}^{-1} = x_{4}x_{2}x_{4}^{-1}x_{2}x_{4}x_{2}^{-1}\\ \Longleftrightarrow\;\;\;\; & x_{2}x_{4}^{-1}x_{2}x_{4}x_{2}^{-1}x_{4}^{-1} = x_{4}^{-1}x_{2}x_{4}x_{2}^{-1}\\ \Longleftrightarrow\;\;\;\; & x_{4}x_{2}x_{4}^{-1}x_{2}x_{4}x_{2}^{-1}x_{4}^{-1} = x_{2}x_{4}x_{2}^{-1}\\ \end{align*} But, $x_{4}x_{2}x_{4}^{-1} = x_{3}, x_{4}x_{2}^{-1}x_{4}^{-1} = x_{3}^{-1}$, so we have
\begin{align*} & x_{3}x_{2}x_{3}^{-1} = x_{2}x_{4}x_{2}^{-1}\\ \Longleftrightarrow \;\;\;& x_{1} = x_{2}x_{4}x_{2}^{-1}\\ \Longleftrightarrow \;\;\;& x_{1}x_{2} = x_{2}x_{4} \end{align*}