I've came across an example and I'm not quite sure on how the solution was met after performing beta-reduction on the following expression. It doesn't show any of the steps. Any help is appreciated!
(x. (y. y)) (a. (b.a))
(y. y)
I've came across an example and I'm not quite sure on how the solution was met after performing beta-reduction on the following expression. It doesn't show any of the steps. Any help is appreciated!
(x. (y. y)) (a. (b.a))
(y. y)
The $(\beta)$ rule tells us that an expression of the form $(\lambda x . s)t$ reduces to $s[t/x]$.
In your case we have $t \equiv (\lambda a .(\lambda b. a))$, and $s \equiv \lambda y . y$.
Then one $\beta$-reduction gives us $s[t/x]$, which is just equivalent to $s$ because $x$ doesn't appear free in $s$.