Let X be a compact CW-complex. The infinite cartesian product $Y=\prod_{n\in\mathbb{N}}X$ is a compact topological space, and as CW-complex It should have a finite number of cells. But in the CW-decomposition of Y given in Cartesian product of two CW-complexes infinite cells appear. What is happening?
2026-03-25 09:24:08.1774430648
$Y=\prod_{n\in\mathbb{N}}X$.
348 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in CW-COMPLEXES
- CW complexes are compactly generated
- If $(X, \Gamma)$ is a cell complex and $e \in \Gamma$, then the image of a characteristic map for $e$ equals its closure
- Universal covering space of $\mathbb{R^3}\setminus S^1$
- Are all cell decompositions useful?
- Give an example of an open cell in a cell complex for which the image of the characteristic map is not a closed cell.
- Computing cellular homology of the sphere using a different CW structure
- Showing that a CW complex is compactly generated
- CW complex with fundamental group $\Bbb Z/n$
- CW complex definition ambiguity
- CW complex for Möbius strip
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
It is not a CW-complex unless $X$ has only a single point. To see this, let $X$ be a CW-complex which has more than one point.
Case 1. $\dim(X) = 0$. Then $X$ is a finite discrete space and $Y$ is an infinite space. If it were a compact CW-complex, then it could have only finitely many $0$-cells. Hence it must have at least one (open) cell $e$ of dimension $n > 0$ which is a homeomorphic copy of $\mathring{D}^n$. We conclude that $Y$ has a connected component with more than one point. On the other hand each component of $Y$ is the product of components of $X$, i.e. has only a single point. This is a contradiction.
Case 2. $\dim(X) > 0$. Then $X$ has an open cell $e$ of dimension $n > 0$ and $Y$ contains a subspace homeomorphic to $E = \prod_{n \in \mathbb{N}} e$. If $Y$ were a CW-complex (which is compact!), it would embed into some $\mathbb{R}^m$. See Hatcher "Algebraic Topology" Corollary A.10. Hence also $E$ would embed into $\mathbb{R}^m$. But now $E$ contains a copy of $\mathbb{R}^{m+1}$, hence $\mathbb{R}^{m+1}$ would embed into $\mathbb{R}^m$. But this is impossible which is the consequence of topological dimension theory. See for example Chapter 7 of Engelking "General Topology" (in particular Theorems 7.1.1, 7.3.3, 7.3.19).