Is there a $3$-connected non-hamiltonian graph with at most $3$ independent vertices ?
I checked the graphs upto $9$ vertices and the cubic graphs upto $18$ vertices and did not find such a graph.
If the answer is yes, which graph is the smallest ?
2026-03-25 23:37:44.1774481864
$3$-connected non-hamiltonian graph with at most $3$ independent vertices
411 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in GRAPH-THEORY
- characterisation of $2$-connected graphs with no even cycles
- Explanation for the static degree sort algorithm of Deo et al.
- A certain partition of 28
- decomposing a graph in connected components
- Is it true that if a graph is bipartite iff it is class 1 (edge-coloring)?
- Fake induction, can't find flaw, every graph with zero edges is connected
- Triangle-free graph where every pair of nonadjacent vertices has exactly two common neighbors
- Inequality on degrees implies perfect matching
- Proving that no two teams in a tournament win same number of games
- Proving that we can divide a graph to two graphs which induced subgraph is connected on vertices of each one
Related Questions in CONNECTEDNESS
- Estimation of connected components
- decomposing a graph in connected components
- Proving that we can divide a graph to two graphs which induced subgraph is connected on vertices of each one
- Does every connected topological space have the property that you can walk around a finite open cover to get from any point to any other?
- A set with more than $n$ components has $n+1$ pairwise separated subsets.
- Can connectedness preservation be used to define continuity of a function?
- Prove the set is not connected
- Related the property of two points contained in the same component
- Is a connected component a group?
- f is a continuous function from (X,$\tau$) to {0,1} with discrete topology, if f non constant then (X,$\tau$) disconnected
Related Questions in HAMILTONIAN-PATH
- constraints to the hamiltonian path: can one tell if a path is hamiltonian by looking at it?
- Most efficient way to detect if a series of n edges creates a cycle of size n.
- Is it true that every graph with $n$ vertices in which $\delta(G)\geq\frac{n}{2}-1$ has Hamiltionian path?
- Prove that if a graph $G$ has a Hamilton path then for every $S \subseteq V(G)$ the number of components of $G - S$ is at most $|S| + 1$
- Using Ore's theorem to show the graph contains a Hamilton cycle
- Graph Theory: Hamilton Cycle Definition Clarification
- Does this graph have a Hamiltonian cycle?
- Show the NP completeness of Hamiltonian Path with the knowledge of an directed Euler graph
- Finding Hamiltonian cycle for $N\times M$ grid where $N$ is even
- Graph Theory - Hamiltonian Cycle, Eulerian Trail and Eulerian circuit
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Here is the theorem that manuellafond pointed to. Here, $\kappa (G)$ is the connectivity of $G$ and $\alpha(G)$ is the independence number.
Proof: Let $C=(v_1,v_2,\ldots,v_k)$ be a cycle of maximum length in $G$ where $v_i$ is adjacent to $v_{i+1}$ (indices taken modulo $k$). Suppose $k<|V(G)|$ and let $x\in V(G)\setminus C$. By Menger's Theorem (See Diestel's book 4th edition, Corollary 3.3.4), there are $\kappa=\kappa(G)$ paths $P_1,\ldots, P_\kappa$, where for all $i$: $P_i$ starts at $x$ and ends at a $v_{j_i}\in C$, all other vertices of $P_i$ are in $V(G)\setminus(C\cup x)$, the $v_{j_i}$ are distinct, and $P_i$ and $P_\ell$ are internally disjoint for all $i\neq \ell$.
For each $i=1,\ldots,\kappa$, let $w_i=v_{{j_i}+1}$, i.e., the next vertex along $C$ from $v_{j_i}$.
No $w_i$ is adjacent to $x$, as otherwise we could delete the edge $(v_{j_i},w_i)$, and add the paths $P_i$ and $(w_i,x)$ to get a longer cycle in $G$. But then in the set of $\kappa+1$ vertices $\{x,w_1,\ldots,w_{\kappa}\}$, there must be a $w_i$ and $w_\ell$ that are adjacent. But now deleting from $C$ the edges $(v_{j_i},w_i)$ and $(v_{j_\ell},w_\ell)$, adding $(w_i,w_j)$ and the paths $P_i$ and $P_\ell$ gives a cycle in $G$ longer than $C$, a contradiction.