Prove that if there is a continuous function$f(x)$ such that every point is a local maximum then $f(x)$ is a constant function. $$$$Suppose that there exists some $a \neq b$ such that $$f(a) < f(b)$$. Now consider the closed interval $[a, b]$. In this interval there is some point $a<x_0<b$ such that $f(x_0)=f(a)$ because as $a$ is the point of local maximum so for some $\delta>0$ we have $$f(x) \leq f(a)$$ for all $x$ in the interval $(a, a+\delta)$. So if there is some $x$ in this interval such that $$f(x)=f(a)$$ then we are done and if not then for all $x$ in this interval we have $$f(x)<f(a)$$ and as $f(a)<f(b)$ and as $f(x)$ is a continuous function so by intermediate value theorem there exists some $x$ such that $$f(x)=f(a)$$. Now consider a set $A$ which contains all $a<x<b$ such that $$f(x)=f(a)$$. Now as set $A$ is bounded so it must have some least Upper Bound say $c$, then in every neighbourhood of $c$ there is some $x$ such that $$f(x)=f(a)$$ and as $$\lim_{x \to c}f(x)=f(c)$$ so we have $f(c)=f(a)$. But again as $c$ is also the point of local maximum sothere exists some $\delta_0$ such that for all $x$ in the interval $(c, c+\delta_0)$ we have $$f(x) \leq f(c)=f(a)$$ but as $c$ is the least Upper Bound of the set $A$ so we have for all $x$ in this interval $$f(x)<f(c)=f(a)$$ but again as $f(b)>f(a)$ and $f(x)$ is a continuous function so there exists some $c<x<b$ such that $$f(c)=f(a)$$, so any $a<c<b$ cannot be the least Upper Bound of set $A$ and hence $b$ is the least Upper Bound of set $A$ then every neighbourhood of $b$ contains some $x$ such that $$f(x)=f(a)$$ but again as $$\lim_{x \to b}f(x)=f(b)$$ so we have $$f(a)=f(b)$$. Similarly we can deal with the case when $$f(a)>f(b)$$ Is My Proof Correct??
2026-04-14 05:14:28.1776143668
A Continuous Function Having Maximum At Every Point
92 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in CALCULUS
- Equality of Mixed Partial Derivatives - Simple proof is Confusing
- How can I prove that $\int_0^{\frac{\pi}{2}}\frac{\ln(1+\cos(\alpha)\cos(x))}{\cos(x)}dx=\frac{1}{2}\left(\frac{\pi^2}{4}-\alpha^2\right)$?
- Proving the differentiability of the following function of two variables
- If $f ◦f$ is differentiable, then $f ◦f ◦f$ is differentiable
- Calculating the radius of convergence for $\sum _{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{\left(\sqrt{ n^2+n}-\sqrt{n^2+1}\right)^n}{n^2}z^n$
- Number of roots of the e
- What are the functions satisfying $f\left(2\sum_{i=0}^{\infty}\frac{a_i}{3^i}\right)=\sum_{i=0}^{\infty}\frac{a_i}{2^i}$
- Why the derivative of $T(\gamma(s))$ is $T$ if this composition is not a linear transformation?
- How to prove $\frac 10 \notin \mathbb R $
- Proving that: $||x|^{s/2}-|y|^{s/2}|\le 2|x-y|^{s/2}$
Related Questions in SOLUTION-VERIFICATION
- Linear transform of jointly distributed exponential random variables, how to identify domain?
- Exercise 7.19 from Papa Rudin: Gathering solutions
- Proof verification: $\forall n \in \mathbb{Z}, 4\nmid(n^2+2)$
- Proof verification: a function with finitely many points of discontinuity is Riemann integrable
- Do Monoid Homomorphisms preserve the identity?
- Cantor-Lebesgue's theorem
- If $a$ is an integer, prove that $\gcd(14a + 3, 21a + 4) = 1$.
- Number theory gcd
- $|G| > 1$ and not prime implies existence of a subgroup other than two trivial subgroups
- Prove/Disprove: Sum of im/ker of linear transformation contained in ker/im of each linear trasnfromation
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Suppose $f$ is defined on the reals and every point is a local $\max$.
Pick some $x^*$ and let $R = \sup \{ r | f(x) \le f(x^*) \text{ for all } x \in [x^*-r,x^*+r]\}$.
Suppose $R$ is finite, then continuity shows that $f(x^*+R) \le f(x^*)$ and $f(x^*-R) \le f(x^*)$ and since $x^* \pm R$ are also local maxima, we see that there is a slightly larger interval for which the condition holds, which is a contradiction. Hence $R$ is infinite and $f(x^*) \ge f(x)$ for all $x$.
Since the same reasoning holds for any other $y^*$ we see that $f$ is constant.