It seems that the following equation does not hold always for the arbitrary relations R1,R1 and R3:
$R1.(R2\cap R3)=(R1.R2)\cap(R1.R3)$
Instead, the right axiom is the following:
$R1.(R2\cap R3) \subseteq (R1.R2)\cap(R1.R3)$
I wrote dot for relation composition, and $\cap$ sign for relation intersection.
Can anybody please think of any counterexample for the first equation?
Thanks
Take for a simplest example $$R_1=\{(a,x),(a,y)\},\\ R_2=\{(x,z)\},\quad R_3=\{(y,z)\}\,.$$ Note also that we have equality with union instead of intersection.