On page 47-48 of Mac Lane's book on Category theory, he uses the notation $\mathbb C^{d_0}$ to denote the functor $\mathbb C^2\to \mathbb C$, defined by $(a:A\to B)\mapsto A$, which takes an arrow to its domain. Can somebody please explain that notation. Mac Lane himself refers to "the end of the last section", but I didn't find there a clear definition.
2026-02-22 19:27:25.1771788445
Please explain Mac Lane notation on page 48
80 Views Asked by Bumbble Comm https://math.techqa.club/user/bumbble-comm/detail At
1
There are 1 best solutions below
Related Questions in CATEGORY-THEORY
- (From Awodey)$\sf C \cong D$ be equivalent categories then $\sf C$ has binary products if and only if $\sf D$ does.
- Continuous functor for a Grothendieck topology
- Showing that initial object is also terminal in preadditive category
- Is $ X \to \mathrm{CH}^i (X) $ covariant or contravariant?
- What concept does a natural transformation between two functors between two monoids viewed as categories correspond to?
- Please explain Mac Lane notation on page 48
- How do you prove that category of representations of $G_m$ is equivalent to the category of finite dimensional graded vector spaces?
- Terminal object for Prin(X,G) (principal $G$-bundles)
- Show that a functor which preserves colimits has a right adjoint
- Show that a certain functor preserves colimits and finite limits by verifying it on the stalks of sheaves
Trending Questions
- Induction on the number of equations
- How to convince a math teacher of this simple and obvious fact?
- Find $E[XY|Y+Z=1 ]$
- Refuting the Anti-Cantor Cranks
- What are imaginary numbers?
- Determine the adjoint of $\tilde Q(x)$ for $\tilde Q(x)u:=(Qu)(x)$ where $Q:U→L^2(Ω,ℝ^d$ is a Hilbert-Schmidt operator and $U$ is a Hilbert space
- Why does this innovative method of subtraction from a third grader always work?
- How do we know that the number $1$ is not equal to the number $-1$?
- What are the Implications of having VΩ as a model for a theory?
- Defining a Galois Field based on primitive element versus polynomial?
- Can't find the relationship between two columns of numbers. Please Help
- Is computer science a branch of mathematics?
- Is there a bijection of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with itself such that the forward map is connected but the inverse is not?
- Identification of a quadrilateral as a trapezoid, rectangle, or square
- Generator of inertia group in function field extension
Popular # Hahtags
second-order-logic
numerical-methods
puzzle
logic
probability
number-theory
winding-number
real-analysis
integration
calculus
complex-analysis
sequences-and-series
proof-writing
set-theory
functions
homotopy-theory
elementary-number-theory
ordinary-differential-equations
circles
derivatives
game-theory
definite-integrals
elementary-set-theory
limits
multivariable-calculus
geometry
algebraic-number-theory
proof-verification
partial-derivative
algebra-precalculus
Popular Questions
- What is the integral of 1/x?
- How many squares actually ARE in this picture? Is this a trick question with no right answer?
- Is a matrix multiplied with its transpose something special?
- What is the difference between independent and mutually exclusive events?
- Visually stunning math concepts which are easy to explain
- taylor series of $\ln(1+x)$?
- How to tell if a set of vectors spans a space?
- Calculus question taking derivative to find horizontal tangent line
- How to determine if a function is one-to-one?
- Determine if vectors are linearly independent
- What does it mean to have a determinant equal to zero?
- Is this Batman equation for real?
- How to find perpendicular vector to another vector?
- How to find mean and median from histogram
- How many sides does a circle have?
Let $\mathcal{C}$ be a category and $\mathbb{D}$ and $\mathbb{E}$ (small) categories. Let $F : \mathbb{D}\to\mathbb{E}$ be a functor. $\mathcal{C}^F : \mathcal{C}^{\mathbb{E}}\to\mathcal{C}^{\mathbb{D}}$ and is defined by $G \mapsto G \circ F$. In this scenario Mac Lane is using, $d_0 : \mathbf1 \to \mathbf 2$ and so $\mathcal{C}^{d_0} : \mathcal{C}^{\mathbf{2}}\to\mathcal{C}^{\mathbf{1}}$. Mac Lane then tacitly uses the equivalence $\mathcal{C}\simeq\mathcal{C}^{\mathbf{1}}$.
An arrow in $\mathcal{C}$ can be identified a functor $\mathbf{2}\to\mathcal{C}$ and an object of $\mathcal{C}$ can be identified with a functor $\mathbf{1}\to\mathcal{C}$. You should work out the details of this if you haven't yet.
More generally, this exponential notation is commonly used in Cartesian closed (or even more generally, monoidally closed) categories.